OK, so I would go for [=exp] (see the reason told in this thread). How acceptable is that guys?
Tuesday, December 5, 2017, 11:56:59 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote: > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: >> Monday, December 4, 2017, 10:21:48 AM, Taher Alkhateeb wrote: >> >>> uh-huh, but I suspect maybe more collisions or need to escape >>> character in something like [this] or <this> than {{this}}. Anyway, >>> nothing critical IMO, only thinking out loud. >> >> But they were [=this] and <=this>, so the sequences that will clash >> are "[=" and "<=", which are quite rare. Oh wait... "<=" is not rare >> at all: "if (x <= y)". But "[=" still is. OK, so I guess at this point >> the two competitors left are {{exp}} and [=exp] (regardless of tag >> syntax). > > +1.00 on [=exp]. > +0.49 on {{exp}}. > > :-D > > Many languages or templates allows ${exp}, including JavaScript. [1] > And, mustache is supported in many languages or templates, too. [2] > Therefore, I think there are more chances using both ${exp} and > {{exp}} in output we want to generate in the future. > The mustache style looks charming at the moment, but I wonder how its > charming can help for the original intention (to avoid any possible > collision in the output we want to generate by an alternative as much > as we can). > > Regards, > > Woonsan > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_interpolation > [2] https://mustache.github.io/ > >> >>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Monday, December 4, 2017, 9:17:34 AM, Taher Alkhateeb wrote: >>>> >>>>> So maybe a safe bet (and a familiar one) is the mustache syntax. >>>>> >>>>> In addition to avoiding clashes it might help with a multi-chained >>>>> template. For example, we use FreeMarker extensively in Apache OFBiz >>>>> to generate many documents including XML. Now our XML documents might >>>>> contain some ${variable} that needs to be interpreted in the XML >>>>> parser, not the freemarker parser (without having to escape characters >>>>> everywhere) >>>> >>>> Though that also works with all the other proposal syntaxes as well. >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Jacques Le Roux >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Le 03/12/2017 à 22:06, Woonsan Ko a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is also most productive as no shift key is required. >>>>>> >>>>>> Depends on keyboard, for French keyboard type (azerty) you need to use >>>>>> Alt >>>>>> key ;) >>>>>> Same for {{...}} anyway >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks, >>>> Daniel Dekany >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> > -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
