Hello Gunnar!
> But the work begins if files needs to be sorted out because of
> privacy or bloating the repo etc. I think fsvs behavior can, because of its
> clueness and different use case, be different in that area. Comparing to svn
> the
> fsvs ignore list is also more centric then some sporadic propsets containing
> ignore rules.
> I am also more for an option that changes the behaviour of "fsvs ignore".
"fsvs ignore" is the wrong place - that's for editing the patterns.
> What about something like "sync-with-ignore" defaulting to false? Would it be
> necessary or even suffice to run a "sync-repos"?
As an option which is used on "commit" it's ok.
"sync-repos" is of course not needed - only the filenames have to be checked
against the
filelist, and get added/unversioned as necessary.
Or it could be used with "add" or "unversion" ...
I'm sorry, I seem to have caused confusion with my remark about "sync-repos".
I meant that there's already a command starting with the letters "sync", and
because
FSVS accepts abbreviations a new command like "sync-with-ignore" could wreck
somebody
trying to use "sync-repos".
(Although, with one more thought, someone who does "sync-repos" must not care
about his
WC list anyway.)
Regards,
Phil
--
Versioning your /etc, /home or even your whole installation?
Try fsvs (fsvs.tigris.org)!
------------------------------------------------------
http://fsvs.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=3923&dsMessageId=2653694
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
