I would also vote for ApacheGearpump + retweeting sugested by Kam.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Manu Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I formerly applied for a Gearpump Twitter account > https://twitter.com/gearpump_io, which consists of the name *Gearpump* and > id *gearpump_io *(since gearpump has been taken). Now that Gearpump is an > Apache Incubating project, shall we > > A. change our name to "Apache Gearpump" or > B. create a new id with "@ApacheGearpump" (available) > > For a Twitter account, the name can be changed at any time while the id is > permanent. > > After some investigation of the Twitter accounts of Apache projects, I > find that they fall into three groups in the format *name/id* > > 1. ApacheProject/@ApacheProject > > - Apache Flink/@ApacheFlink (https://twitter.com/ApacheFlink) > - Apache Parquet/@ApacheParquet (https://twitter.com/ApacheParquet) > - Apache Spark/@ApacheSpark (https://twitter.com/ApacheSpark) > > They created ids after they became Apache projects. > > 2. ApacheProject/@Project > > - Apache Cassandra/@cassandra (https://twitter.com/cassandra) > - Apache Samza/@samzastream (https://twitter.com/samzastream) > > They continue to use the id before they are Apache projects but change > their names. > > 3. ApacheProject/@Project and ApacheProject/@ApacheProject > > - Apache Storm/@stormprocessor (https://twitter.com/stormprocessor) > - Apache Storm/@ApacheStorm (https://twitter.com/ApacheStorm) > > Storm created a new id after becoming an Apache project, and both accounts > are active and have a quite a few followers. > > What do you think ?
