Thanks - will do On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Manu Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think we should go the kafka way which is consistent with the naming of > gearpump libraries and the archive generated by "sbt packArchive" > > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:26 PM Kam Kasravi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ah - thanks Manu - yes i was looking at the nested folders. That is > > incorrect and should be fixed. For excluding the scala version in the tar > > file 'gearpump-0.8.2-incubating-bin.tgz' - I followed the pattern > similar > > to spark which doesn't do this. Although I'm noting that flink does and > > kafka does. Since the latter two are more scala based projects I think I > > should probably include scala in the tar names for both source and bin > tar > > files. For 0.8.1 source release we did not include scala version in the > > name (which was probably a mistake). > > > > To summarize, we should rerelease a RC1 (I can cancel the VOTE) with no > > nested gearpump-2.11-0.8.2 in the gearpump-0.8.2-incubating-bin.tgz > binary > > release and both the source and binary releases should include the scala > > version in their names. Manu - since kafka and flink include the scala > > version in different ways (see > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/kafka/0.10.1.0/ and > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/flink-1.1.3/) which > > convention do you think we should use? > > > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Manu Zhang <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Kam. > > > > > > I find that the scala version is omitted from the tar file. Inside the > > tar > > > file, there is another folder "gearpump-2.11-0.8.2" which contains the > > > actual binaries. Is this the standard way ? > > > > > > Manu > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 12:38 PM Kam Kasravi <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Gearpump Community > > > > > > > > This is a call for a discussion releasing Apache Gearpump > > > > 0.8.2-incubating, release candidate 0. This is the first release > > > candidate. > > > > > > > > The source and binary tarballs, including signatures, digests, etc. > can > > > be > > > > found > > > > at: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/0. > > > 8.2-incubating/RC0/ > > > > > > > > The tag to be voted upon > > > > is > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator- > > > gearpump.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/0.8.2-RC0 > > > > > > > > The release hash > > > > is > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator- > > > gearpump.git;a=tree;h=21fcd2338b248be4ede0d42f30d65b872b2a31d1 > > > > > > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following > > > > key:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/KEYS > > > > > > > > The KEYS file is available > > > > here:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/KEYS > > > > > > > > For information about the contents of this release > > > > see: > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator- > > > gearpump.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.md;h=314d5f0619da0c4170dea6fc6881e5 > > > c09e5153cb;hb=refs/tags/0.8.2-RC0 > > > > > > > > This vote will be open for 96 hours (Tues, November 15, 2016 at > 8:30PM > > > > PST). > > > > > > > > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary > items > > > > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, run the > > > > binary artifacts in the binary release and test. > > > > Please vote: > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as gearpump-0.8.2 > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because... > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Kam > > > > > > > > > >
