I think it also should be considered since it never really got traction as a
beam runner or within alpakka. For alpakka the concept of alternative
ActorMaterializer's was never really fully embraced. I think it came very close
to getting community traction but lost its core group of people driving its
development.
On Sunday, September 9, 2018, 11:47:10 AM PDT, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Manu,
unfortunately, even if I think Gearpump is a very interesting project, I
think we don't have a large community around.
Especially, the dev activity is low, and I agree with you that
retirement should be considered.
Regards
JB
On 09/09/2018 09:37, Manu Zhang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Gearpump has been an Apache incubator since 2016-03-08. Thank you all for
> help to incubate Gearpump and keep it move forward.
>
> The activity around Gearpump has, however, slowed down and the last release
> was more than one year ago. There is no sign of a growing community, which
> is a requirement to be a Apache TLP. The long period of release process has
> made things even harder for such a slim community.
>
> I don't see a future for Gearpump within Apache so it's better off to
> leave.
>
> What do you think ?
>
> Thanks,
> Manu Zhang
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
