-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54539/#review158584
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/internal/distributed/TopEntriesFunctionCollectorJUnitTest.java
 (line 66)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54539/#comment229359>

    Remove these unused latches.



geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/internal/distributed/TopEntriesFunctionCollectorJUnitTest.java
 (line 81)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54539/#comment229360>

    There's no need to use an atomic reference anymore.


- Dan Smith


On Dec. 8, 2016, 6:14 p.m., xiaojian zhou wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/54539/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 8, 2016, 6:14 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode and Dan Smith.
> 
> 
> Bugs: GEODE-2175
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2175
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> resultReciever.getPartitionedDataFrom() will wait for all replies from each 
> receipient and process the reply at the endpoint's local cache. The 
> PRFunctionStreamingResultCollector is the reply processor. 
> 
> Remove the unnecessary wait and change the junit test.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/internal/distributed/TopEntriesFunctionCollector.java
>  d4a7008 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/internal/distributed/TopEntriesFunctionCollectorJUnitTest.java
>  af868e2 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54539/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> precheckin and some manual tests.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> xiaojian zhou
> 
>

Reply via email to