+1 for a separate repo per client. -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1 for a separate repo for each client. > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Joey McAllister <jmcallis...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > +1 to the separate repo. > > > > I think it also makes sense—especially with independent release > > schedules—to keep the client documentation source in the client repo and > > build it as its own User Guide, which we can host in its own section on > > geode.apache.org/docs/. > > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:14 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <ukohlme...@pivotal.io> > > wrote: > > > > +1 to separate client repos. Or at least some ability to independently > > version client code for releases. > > > > --Udo > > > > > > On 1/16/17 11:56, Jacob Barrett wrote: > > > +1 for separate repo for sub-projects that would or could likely > release > > > independently of the core project. I see this applying to most clients, > > > .net, c++, python, etc. It also cleanly separates out the build process > > > which is quite different between these projects. The native clients in > > > particular are dependent a on bunch of toolchains that aren't part of > the > > > standard core developer's toolbox. Even if released together under the > > > umbrella of the Geode product it may still make sense to let them > evolve > > > independently in their own repos to isolate the concerns between the > > > sources. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:52 AM Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> > > wrote: > > > > > >> I’m cautiously in favor of this idea. Allowing independent parts > > (geode, > > >> geode-examples, geode-native) to progress and release at their own > pace > > >> seems like a good thing. > > >> > > >> From a release perspective, I think each repo would have separate > vote > > >> threads and a section on our release page: > > >> http://geode.apache.org/releases/ > > >> > > >> Anthony > > >> > > >>> On Jan 16, 2017, at 11:24 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I would love a separate repo. Someone told me that wasn't an option. > If > > >>> it's an option the let's make it so. > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:20 AM Mark Bretl <mbr...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Jake, > > >>>> > > >>>> Having all the clients in the repository is nice, however, has there > > >> been > > >>>> thought to have them in their own repository? Now that we are a TLP, > > we > > >> do > > >>>> have that capability, as seen with the 'geode-examples' repository. > > >>>> > > >>>> --Mark > > >>>> > > >>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Udo Kohlmeyer < > > ukohlme...@pivotal.io> > > >>>> wrote: > > >> > > >
