Yes it does, immediately on the connect.  So the behavior is different.

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> Seems odd to me that the ‘connect’ command is where the credentials are
> supplied but the failures are only realized when invoking a secure
> command.  So I would need to go back and disconnect / reconnect to fix a
> password typo.
>
> As a reference point, does ‘connect’ over JMX surface authentication
> errors?
>
> Anthony
>
> > On Feb 2, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Kevin Duling <kdul...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> > It's been reported in GEODE-2247 that gfsh can connect in a secured
> > environment without a username/password when using the --use-http flag.
> > When using a jmx connection, this would immediately prompt for
> > user/password.
> >
> > In the http environment, the connection isn't any less secure.  The
> moment
> > one attempts to execute a command that an "anonymous user" cannot
> execute,
> > they will receive a failure with a message informing them that the user
> (in
> > this case anonymous) cannot execute that command.  That's all fine and
> > good, but the UX should probably be to fail instead on the 'connect' when
> > in a secure environment.
> >
> > Opinions?
> >
> > The issue is that gfsh uses the 'ping' endpoint to determine
> connectivity,
> > which is not secured.  Moreover, it starts a connection poll, hitting
> that
> > endpoint every 500ms to ensure the connection is still alive.  I can't
> > determine why it's doing this other than to try to wrap an artificial
> > 'state' in to the stateless nature of REST.  The only advantage I see is
> > that if I kill my server, gfsh knows right away that it's been
> disconnected
> > from it.
> >
> > I have not yet determined whether or not the socket stays open through
> all
> > of this.  I suspect that it does or otherwise I'd see a lot of FIN_WAIT
> > entries in my netstat results.
> >
> > One possible solution to this is to implement security in the endpoint.
> > But ShellCommandsContoller.java doesn't have any security in it.
> Security
> > is handled further downstream.
>
>

Reply via email to