> On March 21, 2017, 10:43 a.m., Jinmei Liao wrote:
> > geode-pulse/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/tools/pulse/internal/PulseAppListener.java
> > Lines 159 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/57796/diff/1/?file=1670527#file1670527line161>
> >
> >     Is this system proeprty set manually or by the locator/server when 
> > starting up the pulse service?
> 
> Kevin Duling wrote:
>     It is set manually by the test.  Prior to my change, Pulse only read from 
> `pulse.properties` off of the classpath to set the `pulse.port` value or used 
> the default.
> 
> Jinmei Liao wrote:
>     So when a user starts a locator with jmx-manager-port other than 1099, he 
> still would have problem having pulse connect to this locator?
> 
> Kevin Duling wrote:
>     He would have to set `pulse.port` to match `jmx-manager-port`.  Pulse has 
> a lot of different properties, such as `pulse.host`, `pulse.embedded`, 
> `pulse.embedded.sqlf`, etc.  They're laid out in the `pulse.properties` file. 
>  One could argue that pulse should look for `jmx-manager-port` but then rules 
> will have to be defined for when someone specifies both properties. Which one 
> wins?
> 
> Jinmei Liao wrote:
>     In the embeded case, I don't think that property file is even used....
> 
> Kevin Duling wrote:
>     Not quite correct.  In the case of embedded, `pulse.host` and 
> `pulse.port` are ignored, but the rest of the properties are loaded and used. 
>  I had tried to use `jmx-manager-port` before, but the properties are not set 
> in the system.  Instead, they are passed down as a properties object and 
> visibility is lost once we reach `line 137` in 
> `ManagementAgent.startAgent()`.  At this point, we turn it over to Jetty to 
> start the service, but the properties aren't handed off.  I'm not sure they 
> can be without setting a system property.  This is why I chose to use the 
> `pulse.port` parameter that Pulse normally looks for.
> 
> Jinmei Liao wrote:
>     In the end, I would like to see user do not have to change a property 
> file in order to get the imbeded pulse to work correctly when starting a 
> locator on a non-default jmx port. The work flow should just be usual:
>     1) in gfsh, when user do: "start locator --jmx-manager-port=2000" (or via 
> proeprty file)
>     2) fire up a browser, type in localhost:7070/pulse and pulse should just 
> work.

Agreed, and tested that scenario.  Works fine.


- Kevin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/57796/#review169587
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 21, 2017, 2:48 p.m., Kevin Duling wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/57796/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 21, 2017, 2:48 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Jinmei Liao, Jared Stewart, Ken Howe, Kirk Lund, 
> and Patrick Rhomberg.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> GEODE-2671: When a locator is started with a custom jmx-manager-port, the 
> embedded pulse server still tries to connect to jmx using 1099
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   geode-assembly/build.gradle 1900896da96afdcc7c776f0cd98a2aea6840fb1d 
>   
> geode-assembly/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/tools/pulse/PulseVerificationTest.java
>  57711258fbbc73570656e14ee8f05550ae32e891 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/management/internal/ManagementAgent.java
>  e88360ba1506f1a7b9c7df87899d5ec19abec630 
>   geode-pulse/build.gradle 298ae5a8a32d621defd3336c21614c588b2ac7dc 
>   
> geode-pulse/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/tools/pulse/internal/PulseAppListener.java
>  5408a5651774a63c16f27722c6ff7bda25cbaaa8 
>   geode-pulse/src/main/resources/pulse.properties 
> 878bc680bbcc4369eb2d3859c6377b8942bc89d7 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57796/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> precheckin restarted
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kevin Duling
> 
>

Reply via email to