Hey guys, take the conversation over to the ticket so context is maintained with the ticket.
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:16 PM Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io> wrote: > For step 2 above, won't we end up recomputing the list of buckets? > > I agree, however, that we do have the problem of moving primary, > especially in the middle of iterating over data. We already have an > optimizeForWrite() method on Function that makes the function execute on > the primary. Do we want to make locking part of this method, rather than > introducing a new method? > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:10 PM Hitesh Khamesra <hitesh...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Swapnil: > > > > Right, and then we execute that function on that node. Now assume during > > that function execution time(first user thread) two things happens > > simultaneously.. > > > > 1. we move that bucket to other node. > > 2. And other user thread execute function with same set of keys on other > > node, which first thread is still executing. > > > > Basically we need to make sure while function execution we don't move the > > primary bucket. > > > > Thanks. > > Hitesh > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io> > > *To:* dev@geode.apache.org; Hitesh Khamesra <hitesh...@yahoo.com> > > *Sent:* Friday, March 24, 2017 1:55 PM > > *Subject:* Re: GEODE-2714 Proposal for new api on Function interface > > (Please read) > > > > Here is the link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2714 > > > > Hi Hitesh, > > > > Before executing a function, we build a list of buckets that the function > > needs to execute on and then we build the function context using only > those > > buckets. So, as long as the function is using the context to get the > local > > data set, it should not see the data twice, even if rebalance was in > > progress. > > > > When you saw this behavior, was the function using the function context? > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 1:21 PM Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > > Can you give a link to the proposal? > > > > Thanks, > > Jared > > > On Mar 24, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Hitesh Khamesra > > <hitesh...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: > > > > > > Please let us know your opinion on that. > > > Thanks.Hitesh > > > > > > > > >
