I don't see how they are different branches? If geode-Native has release/1.2 and Geode has release/1.2?
Sent from my iPhone > On May 4, 2017, at 10:21 AM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > I think it’s confusing to cut a release from different branches for geode, > geode-examples, and geode-native but I don’t have a better idea. > > +0 > > Anthony > >> On May 4, 2017, at 7:29 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote: >> >> All, >> >> I want to start the discussion on releasing Geode Native C++ and .NET >> clients with the next or near future Geode release. >> >> There are a few house keeping items left in the source release JIRA [1]. It >> would be great to get some help completing these tasks. >> >> If we start with a source only release, which Geode release should we >> target? Since it is "adding feature" it seems it makes the most sense to do >> it as part of a minor release, say 1.2. >> >> To throw a little wrench in it all. There are some serious changes coming >> with [2] conversion to std::shared_ptr, [3] removal of all globals, [4] >> replacing all non-standard concurrency methods. These changes won't be >> compatible with sources written against previous releases of geode-native, >> thus suggesting they will need a major rev shortly. My suggestion would be >> to cut a release branch now on geode-native for 1.2 and get it ready for >> source release. Backport any changes on the release branch to develop. That >> leaves develop open for marching forward with what would be a 2.0 set of >> sources. Any release of Geode 1.x would just include the geode-native >> release/1.x branches until Geode 2.0. >> >> Thoughts and feedback? >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1416 >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2807 >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2729 >> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2493 >> >> -Jake >
