[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16001191#comment-16001191
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on GEODE-2824:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 3f1482b689db67a764b1f6507d4482a45e4bd11f in geode's branch 
refs/heads/develop from zhouxh
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geode.git;h=3f1482b ]

GEODE-2824: When advisor cannot found target nodes for bucket id, should double 
check if the member is offline.


> FunctionException: No target node found when executing hasNext on Lucene 
> result
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-2824
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2824
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: lucene
>            Reporter: Jason Huynh
>            Assignee: xiaojian zhou
>
> The stack trace below is thrown during a race condition when a node is 
> closing and calling hasNext on a Lucene result.
> It looks there was a CacheClosedException, but this execution was unable to 
> find a target node to retry on.  This execution then threw a 
> FunctionException.
> We have code to unwrap CacheClosedExceptions from function exceptions, 
> however this was just an ordinary function exception.  The underlying cause 
> is that the cache is closing at this time.
> We should probably wrap all function exceptions with either a 
> LuceneQueryException or equivalent as a user would probably not expect a 
> FunctionException when calling Lucene methods.
> The stack trace:
> {noformat}
> at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.PartitionedRegion.executeOnMultipleNodes(PartitionedRegion.java:3459)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.PartitionedRegion.executeFunction(PartitionedRegion.java:3367)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.execute.PartitionedRegionFunctionExecutor.executeFunction(PartitionedRegionFunctionExecutor.java:228)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.execute.AbstractExecution.execute(AbstractExecution.java:376)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.internal.cache.partitioned.PRFunctionStreamingResultCollector.getResult(PRFunctionStreamingResultCollector.java:178)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.cache.lucene.internal.PageableLuceneQueryResultsImpl.getValues(PageableLuceneQueryResultsImpl.java:112)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.cache.lucene.internal.PageableLuceneQueryResultsImpl.getHitEntries(PageableLuceneQueryResultsImpl.java:91)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.cache.lucene.internal.PageableLuceneQueryResultsImpl.advancePage(PageableLuceneQueryResultsImpl.java:139)
>         at 
> org.apache.geode.cache.lucene.internal.PageableLuceneQueryResultsImpl.hasNext(PageableLuceneQueryResultsImpl.java:148)
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to