[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16031554#comment-16031554
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-2971:
---------------------------------------
Github user jaredjstewart commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/551#discussion_r119420029
--- Diff:
geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/ShellExitCode.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
contributor license
+ * agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with this work for
additional information regarding
+ * copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache
License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the
License. You may obtain a
+ * copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License
+ * is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF
ANY KIND, either express
+ * or implied. See the License for the specific language governing
permissions and limitations under
+ * the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.geode.internal;
+
+public class ShellExitCode {
--- End diff --
E.g.
```
public enum ShellExitCode {
NORMAL(0),FATAL(1), INVALID(1);
private MyEnum(int exitCode) {
this.exitCode = exitCode;
}
private int exitCode;
public int getExitCode(){
return this.exitCode;
}
}
```
> Inconsistency in gfsh status command
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: GEODE-2971
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2971
> Project: Geode
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: gfsh
> Reporter: Patrick Rhomberg
>
> There is a general inconsistency in gfsh's exit status to the shell. This
> makes scripting rather difficult. For instance:
> * Locator & Server Online (+)
> ** --pid: exit code {{0}} for both, all good.
> ** --name: exit code {{0}} for both, all good.
> ** --dir: exit code {{0}} for both, all good.
> * Locator Online, Server Offline (-)
> ** --pid: exit code is {{0}} for both. Nevertheless, the return string when
> executing the command for the server returns a {{null}} within the message
> (where the ip and port should be). As an example: {{Server in
> /path/to/server/directory on null is currently not responding}}.
> ** --name: exit code is {{0}} for the locator, {{1}} for the server because
> there's no online member with the specified name... which raises the
> question: there wasn't any exceptions during the execution, shouldn't we
> return {{0}}?.
> ** --dir: exit code is {{0}} for both. Nevertheless, the return string when
> executing the command for the server returns a {{null}} within the message
> (where the ip and port should be). As an example: {{Server in
> /path/to/server/directory on null is currently not responding}}.
> * Locator & Server Offline (-)
> ** --pid: exit code for locator is {{1}}, and the return string only contains
> {{null}}. The exit code for server is {{0}}, but the return string contains a
> {{null}} within the message (where the ip and port should be). As an example:
> {{Server in /path/to/server/directory on null is currently not responding}}.
> ** --name: both return {{1}}, which is expected since there's no jmx manager
> running and this option requires gfsh to be connected.
> ** --dir: exit code for locator is {{1}}, and the return string only contains
> {{null}}. The exit code for server is {{0}}, but the return string contains a
> {{null}} within the message (where the ip and port should be). As an example:
> {{Server in /path/to/server/directory on null is currently not responding}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
