Hi Barry, What Geode versions are these related to?
Please only use Geode versions when discussing issues on the community lists. Thanks, --Mark On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:26 PM Barry Oglesby <bogle...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Bruce, > > Here is what I am seeing in my test (same one I sent you). > > 904 server -> 823 client: > > Before writing to stream: Client Message Dispatcher for > 192.168.2.4(client:78763:loner):49721:b274160b:client(version:GFE 8.1): > ClientUpdateMessageImpl.getGFE70Message membershipIdLength=39; > membershipId=[4, -64, -88, 2, 4, 0, 0, 4, 3, 5, 10, 87, 0, 1, 57, 87, 0, 4, > 112, 101, 101, 114, -80, 114, 25, 102, 117, -114, -43, -72, -98, -85, -124, > -126, 97, -21, -116, 115, 0] > > Being written to stream: Client Message Dispatcher for > 192.168.2.4(client:78763:loner):49721:b274160b:client(version:GFE 8.1): > EventID.toData writing membershipIdLength=39; membershipId=[4, -64, -88, 2, > 4, 0, 0, 4, 3, 5, 10, 87, 0, 1, 57, 87, 0, 4, 112, 101, 101, 114, -80, 114, > 25, 102, 117, -114, -43, -72, -98, -85, -124, -126, 97, -21, -116, 115, 0] > > 91 server -> 823 client: > > Before writing to stream: Client Message Dispatcher for > 192.168.2.4(client:78763:loner):49721:b274160b:client(version:GFE 8.1): > ClientUpdateMessageImpl.getGFE70Message membershipIdLength=39; > membershipId=[4, -64, -88, 2, 4, 0, 0, 4, 3, 5, 10, 87, 0, 1, 57, 87, 0, 4, > 112, 101, 101, 114, -80, 114, 25, 102, 117, -114, -43, -72, -98, -85, -124, > -126, 97, -21, -116, 115, 0] > > Being written to stream: Client Message Dispatcher for > 192.168.2.4(client:78763:loner):49721:b274160b:client(version:GFE 8.1): > EventID.toData writing membershipIdLength=22; membershipId=[4, -64, -88, 2, > 4, 0, 0, 4, 3, 5, 10, 87, 0, 1, 57, 87, 0, 4, 112, 101, 101, 114] > > In the 904 case, the bytes in the original membership id are written to the > stream. In the 91 case, the last 17 bytes are removed before the membership > id is written to the stream. > > > Thanks, > Barry Oglesby > > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > I've checked in the fix for geode-3153, though Barry said he may still be > > seeing trouble with it. I plan to get together with him on-line > wednesday > > morning, if possible, to step through his test & verify if the problem > > still exists. > > > > I've also pushed the commit to release/1.2.0 > > > > > > > > On 7/1/17 8:54 AM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > > > >> This is a 1.2.0 blocker. It's passed precheckin and new > >> backward-compatibility unit tests and the reviewboard code review has no > >> outstanding issues. I'd like to get a shipIt or two & I'll push the > >> changes to develop and release/1.2.0. > >> > >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/60570/ > >> > >> > > >
