+0

I think sending notifications another list are likely to be ignored, or
at-least hard to make sure people sign up for the new list. I would be for
anything to 'optimize' the amount of emails from the automated systems.

--Mark

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Ernest Burghardt <eburgha...@pivotal.io>
wrote:

> +1 for less noise and spam
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Galen O'Sullivan <gosulli...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I think I'm sending myself convinced by Swapnil's argument.
> >
> > How about muting the "nightly build succeeded" email?
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Sean Goller <sgol...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> > > Concourse sends mail whenever a job fails.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar <
> sbawas...@pivotal.io>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I know travis is already configured to send emails only when the
> build
> > > > breaks and then when it is fixed. Is concourse configured the same?
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:38 AM Patrick Rhomberg <
> prhomb...@pivotal.io
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm with Swapnil on this one.  I think the way we make it less
> noisy
> > is
> > > > to
> > > > > take the time to fix the failing tests.
> > > > >
> > > > > I suppose we could split the difference and give the CI emails a,
> > say,
> > > > > daily cadence.  No news is good news, or else it gives you all the
> > > > failures
> > > > > in the last 24 hours.  Don't know how easy that would be to cache
> and
> > > > > report under the existing framework, though.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Jacob Barrett <
> jbarr...@pivotal.io
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > It’s sad that the most frequent spammer... errrr... I mean mailer
> > is
> > > > the
> > > > > > new CI process. If we aren’t going to send it elsewhere how can
> we
> > > make
> > > > > it
> > > > > > less noisy?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Jake
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mar 20, 2018, at 8:37 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I was curious about the stats for bot vs. humans on the dev
> list.
> > > Out
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > 915 messages, looks like we're about 50% robot.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm still be in favor of not sending these messages to
> dev@geode.
> > > > Long
> > > > > > time
> > > > > > > members have probably already created a mail filter by now (I
> > know
> > > I
> > > > > > have)
> > > > > > > so we're only hurting newbies by sending a bunch of messages.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) apac...@gmail.com 241
> > > > > > > 2) Spring CI 109
> > > > > > > 3) Kirk Lund 63
> > > > > > > 4) Apache Jenkins Server 51
> > > > > > > 5) Anthony Baker 41
> > > > > > > 6) Dan Smith 40
> > > > > > > 7) Travis CI 38
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to