Announcement : The branch for 1.7.0 has been cut. Please from this point onwards use 1.8.0 as the fixed version for your JIRAs
Regards Nabarun Nag On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:34 PM Nabarun Nag <n...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Requesting status update on the following JIRA tickets. These tickets have > commits into develop against its name but the status is still open / > unresolved. > > GEODE-5600 - [Patrick Rhomberg] > GEODE-5578 - [Robert Houghton] > GEODE-5492 - [Robert Houghton] > GEODE-5280 - [xiaojian zhou & Biju Kunjummen] > GEODE-5254 - [Dale Emery] > > GEODE-4794 - [Sai] > GEODE-5594 - [Sai] > > Regards > Nabarun Nag > > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:18 PM Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> Please continue using 1.7.0 as a fix version in JIRA till the email comes >> in that the 1.7.0 release branch has be cut. >> >> Changing the fixed version for the following tickets to 1.7.0 from 1.8.0 >> as these fixes will be included in the 1.7.0 release >> >> GEODE-5671 >> GEODE-5662 >> GEODE-5660 >> GEODE-5652 >> >> Regards >> Nabarun Nag >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 2:20 PM Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> A new feature of get/set cluster config was added as new feature to >>> gfsh. This needs to be added to the documentation. >>> Once this is done, the branch will be ready. >>> >>> Regards >>> Nabarun >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 2:15 PM Alexander Murmann <amurm...@pivotal.io> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Nabarun, do you still see anything blocking cutting the release at this >>>> point? >>>> >>>> Maybe we can even get a pipeline going today? 😳 >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Sai Boorlagadda < >>>> sai.boorlaga...@gmail.com >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> > We can go ahead and cut 1.7 with out GEODE-5338 as I don't have the >>>> code >>>> > ready. >>>> > >>>> > GEODE-5594, adds a new flag to enable hostname validation and is >>>> disabled >>>> > by default so we are good with changes that are already merged and >>>> > documentation for GEODE-5594 is ready merged. >>>> > >>>> > Naba, after the branch is cut we should delete windows jobs from the >>>> branch >>>> > before we create the pipeline for 1.7. >>>> > >>>> > Apologies for holding up the release. >>>> > >>>> > Sai. >>>> > >>>> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 10:23 AM Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > I am waiting on the documentation tickets to get closed before >>>> cutting >>>> > the >>>> > > branch. >>>> > > >>>> > > Regards >>>> > > Nabarun Nag >>>> > > >>>> > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:18 AM Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > > Perhaps we should cut 1.7.0 without these changes to give us more >>>> time >>>> > to >>>> > > > review and complete the work. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Thoughts? >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Anthony >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > > On Aug 31, 2018, at 8:03 AM, Sai Boorlagadda < >>>> > > sai.boorlaga...@gmail.com> >>>> > > > wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > I haven't yet merged GEODE-5338. The PR changes the existing >>>> behavior >>>> > > and >>>> > > > > is not acceptable. >>>> > > > > Working on changing the implementation to have a default value >>>> > derived >>>> > > > > based on how user >>>> > > > > wants to configure SSL. >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > Sai >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:45 AM Sai Boorlagadda < >>>> > > > sai.boorlaga...@gmail.com> >>>> > > > > wrote: >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > >> I have merged GEODE-5594 to develop. >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > > >> GEODE-5338 is now waiting for PR review and precheckin. >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > > >> Sai >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > > >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:30 AM Sai Boorlagadda < >>>> > > > >> sai.boorlaga...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > > >>> GEODE-5338 is downvoted for the security concerns related to >>>> > trusting >>>> > > > >>> the default trust store and thus resulted in an improvement >>>> to add >>>> > a >>>> > > > >>> hostname >>>> > > > >>> validation as a feature before we can support trusting default >>>> > trust >>>> > > > >>> store. >>>> > > > >>> >>>> > > > >>> So GEODE-5338 is blocked by GEODE-5594. >>>> > > > >>> >>>> > > > >>> Once I merge GEODE-5594, I will reinitiate review on >>>> GEODE-5338 PR. >>>> > > > >>> >>>> > > > >>> Sai >>>> > > > >>> >>>> > > > >>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:15 AM Alexander Murmann < >>>> > > > amurm...@pivotal.io> >>>> > > > >>> wrote: >>>> > > > >>> >>>> > > > >>>> Looks like we are now waiting for these tickets: >>>> > > > >>>> >>>> > > > >>>> GEODE-5601 which is a dup of GEODE-5590 which has this open >>>> PR: >>>> > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/2368. >>>> > > > >>>> GEODE-5594 has open PR: >>>> https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/2346 >>>> > > > >>>> GEODE-5338 < >>>> https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/2346GEODE-5338> >>>> > > has >>>> > > > >>>> open PR: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/2244. >>>> > > > >>>> >>>> > > > >>>> Does this look right? >>>> > > > >>>> >>>> > > > >>>> The GEODE-5338 ticket is the most concerning to me right >>>> now. The >>>> > PR >>>> > > > was >>>> > > > >>>> down voted, had some down voted discussion and nothing >>>> since. Sai >>>> > > > >>>> mentioned >>>> > > > >>>> yesterday that this might be able to merge. That's surprising >>>> > given >>>> > > > the >>>> > > > >>>> downvotes and lack of discussion. Sai, do you want to give >>>> us a >>>> > > > update, >>>> > > > >>>> maybe on the PR? >>>> > > > >>>> >>>> > > > >>>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 1:31 AM, Juan José Ramos < >>>> > jra...@pivotal.io >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> wrote: >>>> > > > >>>> >>>> > > > >>>>> Thanks!! >>>> > > > >>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:13 AM Nabarun Nag < >>>> n...@apache.org> >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > > >>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi Juan, >>>> > > > >>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>> GEODE-5618 as PR#2360 has been merged in to develop. The >>>> new >>>> > > branch >>>> > > > >>>> has >>>> > > > >>>>> not >>>> > > > >>>>>> yet been created hence this fix will be in 1.7.0 >>>> > > > >>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>> Regards >>>> > > > >>>>>> Nabarun Nag >>>> > > > >>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:33 AM Juan José Ramos < >>>> > > jra...@pivotal.io >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > >>>>>> wrote: >>>> > > > >>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>> Hello team, >>>> > > > >>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>> Can we also include GEODE-5618 in the next release?. The >>>> pull >>>> > > > >>>> request >>>> > > > >>>>> has >>>> > > > >>>>>>> been approved already, it just needs to be merged. >>>> > > > >>>>>>> Best regards. >>>> > > > >>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:45 PM Bruce Schuchardt < >>>> > > > >>>>>> bschucha...@pivotal.io> >>>> > > > >>>>>>> wrote: >>>> > > > >>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> great! thanks >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On 8/27/18 1:42 PM, Nabarun Nag wrote: >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I completely agree. Once the branch is created, it will >>>> > > > >>>> undergo all >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> compatibility and upgrade tests. >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> The commit that you have mentioned will be reverted in >>>> 1.7.0, >>>> > > > >>>> as >>>> > > > >>>>> well >>>> > > > >>>>>>> as >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> any related commits >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Nabarun Nag >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 1:34 PM Bruce Schuchardt < >>>> > > > >>>>>>> bschucha...@pivotal.io >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I don't think it's as easy as doing a rebase. Someone >>>> added >>>> > > > >>>> the >>>> > > > >>>>> 1.8 >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> version to Version.java and we need to revert that. >>>> We also >>>> > > > >>>> need >>>> > > > >>>>> to >>>> > > > >>>>>>> see >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> if it's being used anywhere for >>>> backward-compatibility. If >>>> > > > >>>> it's >>>> > > > >>>>> in >>>> > > > >>>>>>> use >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> those changes need to be examined and probably undone >>>> on the >>>> > > > >>>>> branch >>>> > > > >>>>>> if >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> they're targeting 1.7 peers/clients. >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 8/27/18 12:11 PM, Nabarun Nag wrote: >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> @Bruce those changes were done when 1.7.0 release >>>> process >>>> > was >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> in-progress, >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> and a release branch was already created. But we >>>> stopped >>>> > that >>>> > > > >>>>>> process >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> mid >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> way. This happened in May 2018. >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> We are planning to rebase the 1.7.0 brach with the >>>> current >>>> > > > >>>>> develop >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> pretty >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> soon. >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Nabarun >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:02 PM Bruce Schuchardt < >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> bschucha...@pivotal.io> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> It looks like we've cut a 1.7.0 release branch that >>>> says >>>> > its >>>> > > > >>>>>> 1.8.0. >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Is >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> that intentional? >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> private static final byte GEODE_180_ORDINAL =95; >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> public static final VersionGEODE_180 = >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> new Version("GEODE","1.8.0", (byte)1, (byte)8, >>>> > > > >>>> (byte)0, >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (byte)0,GEODE_180_ORDINAL); >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/27/18 9:50 AM, Sai Boorlagadda wrote: >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> After reading through the weekend, validating >>>> against CN >>>> > > > >>>> as a >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> fallback should be acceptable and dont have any >>>> further >>>> > > > >>>>> concerns >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> with default JDK's implementation as expressed[1]. >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Planning to merge GEODE-5594 today and following >>>> with >>>> > > > >>>>> GEODE-5338. >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sai >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>> >>>> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/906540e18fa6f85fc77c88c28fc74a >>>> > > > >>>>> 61402471d2eed4ee9dab4813c9@%3Cdev.geode.apache.org%3E >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 5:07 PM Sai Boorlagadda < >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> sai.boorlaga...@gmail.com> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding GEODE-5594, though the current >>>> implementation >>>> > is >>>> > > > >>>>> good >>>> > > > >>>>>>> and >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> needed >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more coverage. >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> While adding tests to cover negative cases, I found >>>> > > > >>>> something >>>> > > > >>>>>>> about >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> JDK's >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> default implementation of >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hostname validation which I am not happy about and >>>> so it >>>> > > > >>>>> needs a >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rethought. It could result in >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementing our own custom algorithm to do >>>> hostname >>>> > > > >>>>> validation. >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will send out details and seek to advise on what >>>> we >>>> > > > >>>> should >>>> > > > >>>>> do >>>> > > > >>>>>>> in a >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> different thread. >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sai >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:52 AM Alexander Murmann >>>> < >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> amurm...@pivotal.io >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To summarize where we are right now in this >>>> discussion, >>>> > > > >>>> I see >>>> > > > >>>>>> the >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets listed in this thread as want-to-haves >>>> for 1.7: >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - GEODE-5615 - ✅ resolved >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - GEODE-5601 - 🏃♀️ in progress >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - GEODE-5594 - 🏃♀️ waiting for PR review >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - GEODE-5338 - 🏃♀️ waiting for PR review >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - GEODE-5619 - 🙄 in progress in JIRA but has >>>> > > > >>>> merged >>>> > > > >>>>> PR. >>>> > > > >>>>>>> What >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> does >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mean? >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything else that needs to go into 1.7? >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems like the best we all can do is to review >>>> Sai's >>>> > > > >>>> PRs. >>>> > > > >>>>> Is >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> that >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct? >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Jens Deppe < >>>> > > > >>>>>> jde...@pivotal.io> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd also like to include GEODE-5619 >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 3:59 PM Xiaojian Zhou < >>>> > > > >>>>>> gz...@pivotal.io >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release will be a great one with so many >>>> > historical >>>> > > > >>>>> bugs >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> fixed. >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today I tried to use IJ to build and run with >>>> latest >>>> > > > >>>>>>> build.gradle >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> and >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recent moved test packages, it worked. So this >>>> > > > >>>> refactoring >>>> > > > >>>>> is >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> also >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> success. >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Anthony Baker < >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> aba...@pivotal.io> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I most definitely agree! >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anthony >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 21, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Dan Smith < >>>> > > > >>>>> dsm...@pivotal.io> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we do want to wait for GEODE-5615 >>>> > > > >>>>> (DistributedTest >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> OOMEs) >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GEODE-5601 (AcceptanceTest port conflicts) to >>>> be >>>> > > > >>>> fixed >>>> > > > >>>>>> before >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cutting >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new 1.7 branch. It would be better if we don't >>>> > > > >>>> create a >>>> > > > >>>>>>> release >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a point where we have these systematic issues >>>> with >>>> > > > >>>> our >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> pipeline. >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dan >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>> -- >>>> > > > >>>>>>> Juan José Ramos Cassella >>>> > > > >>>>>>> Senior Technical Support Engineer >>>> > > > >>>>>>> Email: jra...@pivotal.io >>>> > > > >>>>>>> Office#: +353 21 4238611 <+353%2021%20423%208611> >>>> <+353%2021%20423%208611> >>>> > > > <+353%2021%20423%208611> >>>> > > > >>>>>>> Mobile#: +353 87 2074066 <+353%2087%20207%204066> >>>> <+353%2087%20207%204066> >>>> > > > <+353%2087%20207%204066> >>>> > > > >>>>>>> After Hours Contact#: +1 877 477 2269 <(877)%20477-2269> >>>> <(877)%20477-2269> >>>> > > > <(877)%20477-2269> >>>> > > > >>>>>>> Office Hours: Mon - Thu 08:30 - 17:00 GMT. Fri 08:30 - >>>> 16:00 >>>> > GMT >>>> > > > >>>>>>> How to upload artifacts: >>>> > > > >>>>>>> https://support.pivotal.io/hc/en-us/articles/204369073 >>>> > > > >>>>>>> How to escalate a ticket: >>>> > > > >>>>>>> https://support.pivotal.io/hc/en-us/articles/203809556 >>>> > > > >>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>> [image: support] <https://support.pivotal.io/> [image: >>>> > twitter] >>>> > > > >>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/pivotal> [image: linkedin] >>>> > > > >>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/3048967> [image: >>>> facebook] >>>> > > > >>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/pivotalsoftware> [image: google >>>> > plus] >>>> > > > >>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+Pivotal> [image: youtube] >>>> > > > >>>>>>> < >>>> > > > >>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>> >>>> > > > https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAdzTan_ >>>> > eSPScpj2J50ErtzR9ANSzv3kl >>>> > > > >>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>> -- >>>> > > > >>>>> Juan José Ramos Cassella >>>> > > > >>>>> Senior Technical Support Engineer >>>> > > > >>>>> Email: jra...@pivotal.io >>>> > > > >>>>> Office#: +353 21 4238611 <+353%2021%20423%208611> >>>> <+353%2021%20423%208611> >>>> > > > >>>>> Mobile#: +353 87 2074066 <+353%2087%20207%204066> >>>> <+353%2087%20207%204066> >>>> > > > >>>>> After Hours Contact#: +1 877 477 2269 <(877)%20477-2269> >>>> <(877)%20477-2269> >>>> > > > >>>>> Office Hours: Mon - Thu 08:30 - 17:00 GMT. Fri 08:30 - >>>> 16:00 GMT >>>> > > > >>>>> How to upload artifacts: >>>> > > > >>>>> https://support.pivotal.io/hc/en-us/articles/204369073 >>>> > > > >>>>> How to escalate a ticket: >>>> > > > >>>>> https://support.pivotal.io/hc/en-us/articles/203809556 >>>> > > > >>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>> [image: support] <https://support.pivotal.io/> [image: >>>> twitter] >>>> > > > >>>>> <https://twitter.com/pivotal> [image: linkedin] >>>> > > > >>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/3048967> [image: >>>> facebook] >>>> > > > >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/pivotalsoftware> [image: google >>>> plus] >>>> > > > >>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+Pivotal> [image: youtube] >>>> > > > >>>>> < >>>> > > > >>>> >>>> > > > https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAdzTan_ >>>> > eSPScpj2J50ErtzR9ANSzv3kl >>>> > > > >>>>> >>>> > > > >>>>> >>>> > > > >>>> >>>> > > > >>> >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> >>>
