GEODE-5591 has been reverted in develop ref: 901da27f227a8ce2b7d6b681619782a1accd9330
Regards Nabarun Nag On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:14 AM Ryan McMahon <rmcma...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1 for reverting in both places. > > I see that there is already an isGatewayReceiver flag in the AcceptorImpl > constructor. It's not ideal, but could we use this flag to prevent the 2 > minute retry logic for happening if this flag is true? > > Ryan > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Lynn Hughes-Godfrey < > lhughesgodf...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > +1 for reverting in both places. > > > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > > +1 for reverting in both places. The current fix is not better, that's > > why > > > we are reverting it on the release branch! > > > > > > -Dan > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I’m not ok with reverting in develop. Revert in 1.7 and modify in > > > develop. > > > > We shouldn’t go backwards in develop. The current fix is better than > > the > > > > bug it fixes. > > > > > > > > > On Sep 5, 2018, at 9:40 AM, Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If everyone is okay with it, I will revert that change in develop > and > > > > then > > > > > cherry pick it to release/1.7.0 branch. > > > > > Please do comment. > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > Nabarun Nag > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 9:30 AM Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> +1 to yank it and rework the fix. > > > > >> > > > > >> Gester's change helps, but it just means that you will sometimes > > > > randomly > > > > >> have a 2 minute delay starting up a gateway receiver. I don't > think > > > > that is > > > > >> a great user experience either. > > > > >> > > > > >> -Dan > > > > >> > > > > >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:20 AM, Bruce Schuchardt < > > > > bschucha...@pivotal.io> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> Let's yank it > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> On 9/4/18 5:04 PM, Sean Goller wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> If it's to get the release out, I'm fine with reverting. I don't > > > like > > > > >> it, > > > > >>>> but I'm not willing to die on that hill. :) > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> -S. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:38 PM Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> > > wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Spitting this into a separate thread. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> I see the issue. The two minute timeout is the constructor for > > > > >>>>> AcceptorImpl, where it retries to bind for 2 minutes. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> That behavior makes sense for CacheServer.start. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> But it doesn't make sense for the new logic in > > > > GatewayReceiver.start() > > > > >>>>> from > > > > >>>>> GEODE-5591. That code is trying to use CacheServer.start to > scan > > > for > > > > an > > > > >>>>> available port, trying each port in a range. That free port > > finding > > > > >> logic > > > > >>>>> really doesn't want to have two minutes of retries for each > port. > > > It > > > > >>>>> seems > > > > >>>>> like we need to rework the fix for GEODE-5591. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Does it make sense to hold up the release to rework this fix, > or > > > > should > > > > >>>>> we > > > > >>>>> just revert it? Have we switched concourse over to using alpine > > > > linux, > > > > >>>>> which I think was the original motivation for this fix? > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> -Dan > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> > > > wrote: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Why is it waiting at all in this case? Where is this 2 minute > > > timeout > > > > >>>>>> coming from? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> -Dan > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Sai Boorlagadda < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>> sai.boorlaga...@gmail.com > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>> So the issue is that it takes longer to start than previous > > > > releases? > > > > >>>>>>> Also, is this wait time only when using Gfsh to create > > > > >>>>>>> gateway-receiver? > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:03 PM Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Currently we have a minor issue in the release branch as > > pointed > > > > out > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> by > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Barry O. > > > > >>>>>>>> We will wait till a resolution is figured out for this > issue. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Steps: > > > > >>>>>>>> 1. create locator > > > > >>>>>>>> 2. start server --name=server1 --server-port=40404 > > > > >>>>>>>> 3. start server --name=server2 --server-port=40405 > > > > >>>>>>>> 4. create gateway-receiver --member=server1 > > > > >>>>>>>> 5. create gateway-receiver --member=server2 `This gets stuck > > > for 2 > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> minutes` > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Is the 2 minute wait time acceptable? Should we document it? > > > When > > > > we > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> revert > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> GEODE-5591, this issue does not happen. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Regards > > > > >>>>>>>> Nabarun Nag > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
