Hi Jason,
We can wait until the investigation is completed, as this can be a
potential -1 to the RC.
Regards
Nabarun Nag
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 12:20 PM Jason Huynh <jhu...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> I'm currently looking into an issue in WAN when running this rc. Not sure
> if it's a showstopper and I can't actually describe what the problem is,
> but a sample application I have is not behaving the same as before, there
> may be a data inconsistency... if it's not too late, would you be able to
> extend the vote?
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:47 AM Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > +0
> > Recasting my vote, just for full disclosure. I found a (very minor)
> problem
> > in the source release doc files: If a user builds their own docs from
> > sources, they'll say version 1.8.
> >
> > - NOT (even close to) a showstopper
> > - This will NOT affect the User Guide we'll push to the website with
> the
> > release, which will be correctly labeled 1.7
> > - Javadocs are NOT affected - they are correctly versioned as 1.7
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Sai Boorlagadda <
> > sai.boorlaga...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > * verified commit hash
> > > * checked concourse pipeline is green
> > > * ran examples with RC1
> > > * built from source
> > >
> > > Sai
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 8:46 AM Nabarun Nag <n...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > > REMINDER: VOTE deadline is today (EOD 19th September 2018 PDT)
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Nabarun Nag
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 7:13 AM Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I think we can get rid of the **/out/** exclusion in the build
> > script,
> > > > > let’s do that for the next release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anthony
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sep 18, 2018, at 3:52 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I noticed that someone added some files called "out" to the repo
> > that
> > > > > > aren't included in the source distribution:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ./ci/resource-types/gce-instances-resource/out
> > > > > > ./ci/resource-types/concourse-metadata-resource/files/out
> > > > > >
> > > > > > These aren't included in the source distribution because we are
> > > > > explicitly
> > > > > > excluding anything called "out." Presumably we thought anything
> > > called
> > > > > out
> > > > > > is an output directory ("out" is also in .gitignore). So the ci
> > > > directory
> > > > > > in the source distribution is incomplete. But maybe that doesn't
> > > matter
> > > > > > because it is just CI configuration?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Everything else looks good.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Dan
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> *DEADLINE :* Kindly complete your vote by Wednesday, 19th
> > September
> > > > > 2018.
> > > > > >> End of day PDT.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Following checks completed:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> - checked signatures
> > > > > >> - checked sha’s
> > > > > >> - builds from source
> > > > > >> - run gfsh - start locator, server - create region - do put and
> > get
> > > -
> > > > > >> execute OQL query
> > > > > >> - examples run cleanly
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> @John Blum <jb...@pivotal.io> , I was looking into the mail
> chain
> > > for
> > > > > >> Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC and I saw that you had some concerns
> > regarding
> > > > SD
> > > > > >> Geode's behavior with the changes made to Log4j in Apache Geode.
> > In
> > > > this
> > > > > >> release, too we have made some upgrades to log4j and we would to
> > > hear
> > > > > your
> > > > > >> feedback / get a green light on these changes.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards
> > > > > >> Nabarun Nag
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:50 PM Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Correction :
> > > > > >>> Please note that we are voting upon the source tags:
> > rel/v1.7.0.RC1
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:49 PM Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> This is the first release candidate for Apache Geode, version
> > > 1.7.0.
> > > > > >>>> Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to
> > > this
> > > > > >>>> release!
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Please do review and give your feedback.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> It resolves 351 issues on Apache Geode JIRA system. Release
> > notes
> > > > can
> > > > > be
> > > > > >>>> found at:
> > > > > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/
> > > > > >>>> Release+Notes#ReleaseNotes-1.7.0
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Please note that we are voting upon the source tags:
> > > rel/v1.6.0.RC1
> > > > > >>>> Apache Geode:
> > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/geode/tree/rel/v1.7.0.RC1
> > > > > >>>> Apache Geode examples:
> > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/geode-examples/tree/rel/v1.7.0.RC1
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Commit ID:
> > > > > >>>> Apache Geode:
> > > > > >>>> f9abdeb489c9278f96afd37f72a7a9d14cb0f154
> > > > > >>>> Apache Geode Examples:
> > > > > >>>> 9dca29c7c10fa8d44abc893271420476cfc0808f
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Source and binary files:
> > > > > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geode/1.7.0.RC1/
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Maven staging repo:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeode-1042
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Geode's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > release:
> > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/geode/blob/develop/KEYS
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Signed the release with fingerprint:
> > > > > >>>> rsa4096 2018-01-04 [SC] [expires: 2022-01-04]
> > > > > >>>> CE6CD0A89480B1B9FCB98699274C66710770C135
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> rsa4096 2018-01-04 [SC] [expires: 2022-01-04]
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> I do apologize if there was an oversight.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Regards
> > > > > >>>> Nabarun Nag
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
