+1 Quarterly releases

--
Mike Stolz
Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager
Mobile: 631-835-4771

On Oct 8, 2018 6:52 PM, "Sai Boorlagadda" <sai.boorlaga...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for time-based minors (if patches are reserved for security fixes)
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 2:55 PM Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > We reserve the patch version number for when we want to issue a fix for a
> > security vulnerability or address a critical bug.  We did that with 1.1.1
> > and 1.2.1.
> >
> > I think the release schedule and SemVer are separate topics.  AFAICT this
> > proposal is just about putting a more deterministic schedule around what
> we
> > are already doing / have been doing.  Given that releases have
> significant
> > overhead, I think it makes sense to plan ahead.  If you want to know more
> > about that ask Naba, the last release manager :-)
> >
> >
> > Anthony
> >
> >
> > > On Oct 8, 2018, at 2:42 PM, Udo Kohlmeyer <u...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > -0
> > >
> > > It seems we have completely disregarded the *patch* version number.
> Does
> > this mean Geode versions will be *major*,*minor*? Can we then remove the
> > *patch* version on the release version?
> > >
> > > In addition to this, should the test coverage not be sufficient enough
> > to allow "release when green"? I must agree with @Jacob, I would prefer
> > something a lot less formalized. If  the community has contributed a
> > significant fix, should that not warrant an ad-hoc patch release? Or what
> > if the community has added functionality, that could "fill" a single
> minor
> > release by itself, should that not warrant a pre-emptive release.
> > >
> > > All these questions are not enough to warrant this effort to be
> blocked,
> > but I prefer those use cases to be considered for a more comprehensive
> > documentation effort, than what is currently on the wiki.
> > >
> > > In addition to that, is a release with only bug fixes in it, really
> > still a worthy of minor release number, or does it not count as a patch
> > release?
> > >
> > > --Udo
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/8/18 14:27, Jacob Barrett wrote:
> > >> +0
> > >>
> > >> My preference is to release when there is something worth releasing
> > rather
> > >> than arbitrary points in time but I don't hold that preference
> strongly
> > >> enough to spike this effort.
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 2:24 PM Alexander Murmann <amurm...@pivotal.io
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>
> > >>> As discussed in "Predictable minor release cadence", I'd like us to
> > find
> > >>> agreement on releasing a new minor version every three months. There
> > are
> > >>> more details in the other thread and I should have captured
> everything
> > >>> relevant on the wiki:
> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Release+Schedule
> > >>>
> > >>> There are also some discussions about patch releases. Let's please
> > focus
> > >>> this vote on the proposed minor release schedule and carry on other
> > >>> discussions in the [DISCUSS] thread.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank you all!
> > >>>
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to