I need more time to think about this clearly (currently juggling multiple
things), but I would say this...

I don't think there should be "internal" APIs, as in o.a.g.*.internal.
There are only APIs/SPIs and implementations, period.  If you want to
maintain an API as internal, then you should properly protect that API with
the appropriate *Java* access modifiers (private, package-private and
protected).

-j


On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:29 AM Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:23 AM Udo Kohlmeyer <ukohlme...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Imo, no module should export "internal". Maybe a stretch goal, but
> > something we should keep in mind.
> >
>
> Yes, agreed, but outside the scope of this current discussion.
>


-- 
-John
john.blum10101 (skype)

Reply via email to