I need more time to think about this clearly (currently juggling multiple things), but I would say this...
I don't think there should be "internal" APIs, as in o.a.g.*.internal. There are only APIs/SPIs and implementations, period. If you want to maintain an API as internal, then you should properly protect that API with the appropriate *Java* access modifiers (private, package-private and protected). -j On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:29 AM Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:23 AM Udo Kohlmeyer <ukohlme...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > Imo, no module should export "internal". Maybe a stretch goal, but > > something we should keep in mind. > > > > Yes, agreed, but outside the scope of this current discussion. > -- -John john.blum10101 (skype)