+1 to a spotless rule.  Unless anyone objects, I’ll look into doing that
after PowerMock is eliminated.

Ryan

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:50 PM Helena Bales <hba...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> Once we have refactored tests currently using PowerMock, it might be
> prudent to introduce a spotless rule to prohibit the reintroduction of
> PowerMock.
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:32 PM Ryan McMahon <mcmellaw...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I am interested in contributing to this effort.  I removed PowerMock
> usage
> > from one set of tests (GEODE-6052), and at that time I took a quick
> glance
> > at other usages.  I’ll assign GEODE-6143 to myself and see about removing
> > the remaining usages.
> >
> > Ryan
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:08 PM Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I filed GEODE-6143: PowerMock should not be used in Geode tests.
> > >
> > > We need everyone to stop using PowerMock in new tests. If anyone sees a
> > PR
> > > attempting to use PowerMock please let the contributor know about
> > > GEODE-6143. The alternative is to refactor product code such that
> > > dependencies are passed into the constructor instead of reaching out to
> > > singletons and to avoid using static methods or static final fields for
> > > anything would would make testing more difficult.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:20 AM Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 to removing PowerMock. Any situation that needs PowerMock needs
> > > > refactoring more.
> > > >
> > > > -Dan
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:27 AM Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Anyone have any ideas which unit test is using PowerMock and is
> > > > injecting a
> > > > > mock ClassLoader? This keeps failing in my precheckin runs. I think
> > we
> > > > need
> > > > > to a) remove all uses of PowerMock and b) forbid its use going
> > forward.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018-12-04 18:11:36,258 Distributed system shutdown hook ERROR
> Could
> > > not
> > > > > reconfigure JMX java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint
> violation:
> > > > loader
> > > > > (instance of org/powermock/core/classloader/MockClassLoader)
> > previously
> > > > > initiated loading for a different type with name
> > > > > "javax/management/MBeanServer"
> > > > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
> > > > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:763)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.powermock.core.classloader.MockClassLoader.loadUnmockedClass(MockClassLoader.java:262)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.powermock.core.classloader.MockClassLoader.loadModifiedClass(MockClassLoader.java:206)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.powermock.core.classloader.DeferSupportingClassLoader.loadClass1(DeferSupportingClassLoader.java:89)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.powermock.core.classloader.DeferSupportingClassLoader.loadClass(DeferSupportingClassLoader.java:79)
> > > > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:357)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.jmx.Server.unregisterAllMatching(Server.java:337)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.jmx.Server.unregisterLoggerContext(Server.java:261)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.jmx.Server.reregisterMBeansAfterReconfigure(Server.java:165)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.jmx.Server.reregisterMBeansAfterReconfigure(Server.java:141)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.LoggerContext.setConfiguration(LoggerContext.java:558)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.LoggerContext.reconfigure(LoggerContext.java:619)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.LoggerContext.reconfigure(LoggerContext.java:636)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > >
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.LoggerContext.start(LoggerContext.java:231)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.impl.Log4jContextFactory.getContext(Log4jContextFactory.java:243)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.impl.Log4jContextFactory.getContext(Log4jContextFactory.java:45)
> > > > > at
> > org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager.getContext(LogManager.java:174)
> > > > > at
> org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager.getLogger(LogManager.java:661)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.geode.internal.logging.LogService.getLogger(LogService.java:64)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.geode.internal.tcp.ConnectionTable.<clinit>(ConnectionTable.java:61)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.geode.distributed.DistributedSystem.setThreadsSocketPolicy(DistributedSystem.java:263)
> > > > > at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.geode.distributed.internal.InternalDistributedSystem.lambda$static$0(InternalDistributedSystem.java:2317)
> > > > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to