@Dan,
Thank you for your first attempt at this.
Maybe we should be a rename "Active" to "Completed". "Active" to me
means that we are currently working on them, rather having completed
them. I don't view these proposals as features that can be toggled
on/off (or active/inactive).
Also, I disagree with the approach that proposals that are not actively
worked on are "Dropped". Which in itself is incorrect as well. Maybe
there should be an "Icebox" area, that lists a set of proposals that
have not yet been approved, but also not yet rejected.
I think it is ok to have an "Icebox" of proposals that lists areas of
improvement we want to target, but as of yet, no concrete proposal has
yet been submitted. Modularity comes to mind. It is not that we don't
want to do it, it is just that there is no proposal that has been
accepted/completed.
--Udo
On 7/12/19 12:57, Dan Smith wrote:
Following up on this, I took a stab at organizing our old proposals into
the buckets on the wiki. We now have:
Under Discussion - Draft and In Discussion proposals
In Development - proposals under active development
Active - Proposals that are completely implemented
Dropped - Proposals that were not approved or development stalled out.
If I moved your proposal to "Dropped" erroneously, please feel free to move
it back! I moved things there that did not appear to have been implemented
or have any recent activity.
I put a few things in "Unknown State." If you know what state these
proposals are in, please move them!
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Project+Proposals+and+Specifications
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:20 AM Alexander Murmann <ajmurm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Given discussion here and previous discussion on the PR, I consider this
proposal approved and updated its state accordingly.
I also incorporated Dan's suggestion of moving deprecated proposals and
added a reference to the new process at the top of the Project Proposals
and Specifications page
<
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Project+Proposals+and+Specifications
.
Thank you all for you great feedback throughout this process!
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:07 AM Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote:
Will moving the page around on the wiki result in dead links to the
draft
version?
No. If you use the share button in the wiki, you get a permanent link to
the page. Even if you just copy the URL from the address bar it doesn't
include the folder the page is in.
-Dan
--
Alexander J. Murmann
(650) 283-1933
