For a pure-java implementation, might be worth considering https://github.com/eiiches/jackson-jq
> On Sep 25, 2019, at 9:40 AM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > +1 - sounds good. > > BTW - We've previously found libraries that use JNA tend to be more > flaky/platform dependent than pure java libaries - for example we ripped > out a snappy native wrapper in favor of a pure java implementation. > > -Dan > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 8:39 AM Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> Sounds good, thanks for the heads up. >> >> Anthony >> >> >>> On Sep 25, 2019, at 8:37 AM, Jinmei Liao <jil...@pivotal.io> wrote: >>> >>> Management rest api wants to add some default jq selector to the swagger >>> api docs so that the downstream client tool can use it as a starting >> point >>> to filter/format the json response to a more readable form. In order to >>> test these jq selectors, we would like to use a java library described >>> here: https://github.com/arakelian/java-jq, it basically provides a java >>> wrapper around 'jq' tool. Github shows both MIT and apache license. We >> will >>> only be using it for testing. >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers >>> >>> Jinmei >> >>
