Thanks for the additional context, Udo! That makes a lot of sense.

I want to make sure we are very deliberate about including anything but a
critical fix in a release branch after it has been cut.

+1 to including Udo's change once we feel confident about the tests

On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:27 PM Jinmei Liao <jil...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> Even though the management service is still marketed as "experimental" and
> we don't need to go through deprecations, I would still very much prefer
> this gets pulled into 1.12 so that users don't have to deal with
> experimental public API changes.
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:23 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <u...@apache.com> wrote:
>
> > @Alexander, I can most certainly elaborate more.
> >
> > In short, this refactor does not have to be in 1.12, but it does alter
> > public Builders and classes. Which means, that if we don't release it
> > with 1.12, we would have to go through the cycle of deprecation,etc. to
> > get this change in. Given that the initial GEODE-7715 ticket is not in
> > any released version of Geode, it would just simplify the process of not
> > having to go through unnecessary pain to simplify and make this process
> > more intuitive for users.
> >
> > Does this answer your question as to why?
> >
> > --Udo
> >
> >
> > On 2/5/20 3:01 PM, Alexander Murmann wrote:
> > > Udo, you say "refactor", but this sounds more like a feature or user
> > facing
> > > improvement. Do you mind elaborating a little more why this should be
> in
> > > this release?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:54 PM Patrick Johnson
> > <jpatr...@vmware.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> On 2/5/20, 1:53 PM, "Udo Kohlmeyer" <u...@apache.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>      Hi there Geode dev,
> > >>
> > >>      I would like to request that GEODE-7752
> > >>      (7028f601680fee3f57cbdff63951128d7180ca13) gets included into
> 1.12.
> > >>
> > >>      This piece of code is a refactor of work done in GEODE-7715. This
> > >>      refactor specializes Builders and simplifies Builder behavior for
> > >> better
> > >>      user experience.
> > >>
> > >>      --Udo
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Jinmei
>

Reply via email to