Experimental features are subject to change or removal. No guarantees are
made of backwards compatibility.

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:53 PM Donal Evans <doev...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> Looks good to me. Fixing broken implementation and providing reliable HA
> can only be a good thing. My only concern is the backwards compatibility
> issue, but I don't know if we make any guarantees regarding that for
> experimental features, so it may be a non-issue.
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:35 AM Raymond Ingles <ring...@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > Just a quick nudge - we set a deadline for comments for tomorrow. Anyone
> > had a chance to look this over yet? Thanks!
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 2:09 PM Raymond Ingles <ring...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The current Redis API support in Geode has been marked experimental
> for a
> > > couple years and has several bugs and inconsistencies compared to
> native
> > > Redis. We created a RFC for updating the Geode Redis API support, to
> > > address issues in the implementation, improve performance and add High
> > > Availability support.
> > >
> > > Please review and comment by 5/8/2020.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Redis+API+Improvements
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to