For the record, docs impact is negligible. Protobuf was never documented in the User Guides, and mentions in the API docs will disappear when those are re-built along with the software.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:55 AM Bruce Schuchardt <bru...@vmware.com> wrote: > Yes, that's a Go client for Geode. I have already contacted the author > and he's okay with our removing support for it in Geode. > > On 3/23/21, 11:49 AM, "Mario Salazar de Torres" > <mario.salazar.de.tor...@est.tech> wrote: > > Given this is on stall > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgemfire%2Fgeode-go-client&data=04%7C01%7Cbruces%40vmware.com%7C5b6bc29594c5409b52af08d8ee2c6df5%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637521221887355590%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=8mJbnOgZHtUiwcQ66bKoaA%2BpoF91S67zrrdTXhQUtPs%3D&reserved=0 > I'd say +1 for removal > [ > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Favatars.githubusercontent.com%2Fu%2F194656%3Fs%3D400%26v%3D4&data=04%7C01%7Cbruces%40vmware.com%7C5b6bc29594c5409b52af08d8ee2c6df5%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637521221887355590%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=sQl%2FRtdZ%2BsH8QtdhlKl3ZAVKWNzG7zpW6lyrCCTNmWU%3D&reserved=0 > ]< > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgemfire%2Fgeode-go-client&data=04%7C01%7Cbruces%40vmware.com%7C5b6bc29594c5409b52af08d8ee2c6df5%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637521221887355590%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=8mJbnOgZHtUiwcQ66bKoaA%2BpoF91S67zrrdTXhQUtPs%3D&reserved=0 > > > GitHub - gemfire/geode-go-client< > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgemfire%2Fgeode-go-client&data=04%7C01%7Cbruces%40vmware.com%7C5b6bc29594c5409b52af08d8ee2c6df5%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637521221887355590%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=8mJbnOgZHtUiwcQ66bKoaA%2BpoF91S67zrrdTXhQUtPs%3D&reserved=0 > > > What is this? This is the beginning of a Go client for Apache Geode.It > uses Geode's new protobuf-based client protocol to communicate with > locators and servers. > github.com > > ________________________________ > From: Alexander Murmann <amurm...@vmware.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 7:46 PM > To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server > interface > > +1 for removal > ________________________________ > From: Mark Hanson <hans...@vmware.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:44 > To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server > interface > > +1 for removal. > > On 3/23/21, 8:46 AM, "Darrel Schneider" <dar...@vmware.com> wrote: > > I'm in favor of its removal. I was working on improving the geode > thread monitor and found doing that on the protobuf code was much more > complicated. > ________________________________ > From: Bruce Schuchardt <bru...@vmware.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 8:16 AM > To: dev@geode.apache.org <dev@geode.apache.org> > Subject: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server > interface > > Hi folks, > > We’ve had an experimental client/server interface in Geode that > no-one to my knowledge is using. We’re testing it with every build and are > having to make changes to it to keep it up to date with the rest of the > project. The last change of substance to the geode-protobuf sub-project, > for instance, was in 2018 but that’s been followed by many incidental > commits. > > GEM-8997< > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FGEODE-8997&data=04%7C01%7Cbruces%40vmware.com%7C5b6bc29594c5409b52af08d8ee2c6df5%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637521221887355590%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=rsMzoC4JXtz94TGCCwQLSvTs4A%2B1KBkepBkeDIcLSVY%3D&reserved=0> > was opened to have the sub-projects for this interface removed. I’ve > prepared a pull request< > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fgeode%2Fpull%2F6168&data=04%7C01%7Cbruces%40vmware.com%7C5b6bc29594c5409b52af08d8ee2c6df5%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637521221887355590%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=2sptzH4HyG%2BBEF5RJDs08SRqx3K%2BoI4rwSMm7mpMXeU%3D&reserved=0> > to remove it and would like to get consensus to move forward with that > effort. > > >
