Summarizing this thread so far: In favor of making stress-new non-required: Kirk Mark Myself
In favor of making all PR checks non-required: Jake In favor of hashing out a more nuanced balance between making it possible (but not too easy) to ignore stress-new failures: Donal Dale Maybe that's rough concensus in terms of which option to recommend, but hardly a thread I would feel comfortable citing as evidence that the community is on board with striking down a longstanding protection that was enacted through a [VOTE]. On 6/9/21, 2:11 PM, "Anthony Baker" <bak...@vmware.com> wrote: If we have consensus, no need to VOTE. > On Jun 9, 2021, at 12:52 PM, Owen Nichols <onich...@vmware.com> wrote: > > Ok, I'm on board with changing stress-new-test from a required PR check to non-required. It's simple, codeowners still have the final say, and it neatly avoids the whole topic of overrides. Time to take a [VOTE]? >