On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Gregory Chase <[email protected]> wrote:
> Fellow contributors,
> I currently hold @ASFGeode and @ApacheGeode and have not tweeted from them
> awaiting exactly this conversation.
>
> I will set up a TweetDeck account that can be accessed by those with access
> to [email protected], and by those on the PMC, or delegates
> thereof.

Perfect! As William captured in his Social media guidelines wiki page
the proposal for this is to be an opt-in scheme. As such, could you
please add my account rhatr to both via the Tweedeck?

> I recommend, however, that this single Twitter account, and the
> Geode.incubator.Apache.org website be the only communication vehicles for
> the project.  My reasons are as follows:
>
> 1)  Apache Geode is a collaborative software development community, and its
> communications should reflect this. It should not be a marketing engine.
>
> 2)  Many social media channels are a lot to maintain, and it also dilutes
> communications.   As a primarily text-based medium, Twitter works well for
> linking and curating to third party content.

Great points! +1

> 3) We are trying to build a supportive community around Apache Geode, and
> we should encourage others to keep their names associated with content
> about Geode they create. I believe its good for multiple parties to be
> supporting Geode, not just have a monolithic Geode brand in this case.
>
> 4) How does the PMC decide what content is "Geode" branded and what content
> is not "Geode" branded? I recommend we keep this very simple:  Software
> versions, official product documentation, and the website are "Geode"
> branded.  Everything else should be branded according to its producer &
> source.  Apache Geode can curate such content, but leave it branded, and
> residing on the source feed of the producer.

Both are really great point, but I think there's a happy medium. Lets take
slideshare as an example: things that are linked/embedded from our wiki
would make sense (in my mind) to be posted under Geode account on
slideshare. Things that are more personal voices/etc. make total sense
under personal accounts.

Long story short: I agree with you that usage of anything other than Twitter
account will not be huge, but I also think we should reserve the handles
and even post things there from time to time.

Makes sense?

Thanks,
Roman.

Reply via email to