-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/34814/#review85914
-----------------------------------------------------------


Attached patch 0002 to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-38

Three changes
o- Correcting code format for diffs for original files and full file for new 
files.
o- Renamed unit tests to match expected naming
o- Reset system properties to original values following tests

- Neil Stevenson


On May 29, 2015, 3:39 p.m., Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/34814/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 29, 2015, 3:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode.
> 
> 
> Bugs: GEODE-38
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-38
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Gfsh launcher script implies an init file can be used. This was possible in 
> GF 6.6, but wasn't implemented in the transition to the new Gfsh in GF 7.0 
> onwards.
> From "gemfire-assembly/src/main/dist/bin/gfsh.bat " :
> "
> #
> Copy default .gfshrc to the home directory. Uncomment if needed.
> #
> #if [ ! -f $HOME/.gemfire/.gfsh2rc ]; then
> cp $GEMFIRE/defaultConfigs/.gemfire/.gfsh2rc $HOME
> #fi
> "
> If this file is specified, it is currently ignored.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/management/internal/cli/shell/Gfsh.java
>  d9a396a 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/management/internal/cli/shell/GfshConfig.java
>  d7dba5a 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/management/internal/cli/shell/GfshConfigInitFileTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/management/internal/cli/shell/GfshInitFileTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/34814/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Roman Shaposhnik
> 
>

Reply via email to