+1 to both suggestions; alpha-1 release and Jira for tracking this release.
Thanks, Ashvin On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Anthony Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > As Justin mentioned, we need to make progress towards our first Geode > release. If we define that initial release as an alpha-quality artifact > that we can rapidly iterate on, we can narrow the scope down to just > GEODE-77 (and perhaps GEODE-18). Are there other issues we need to address? > > I suggest we use the JIRA roadmap feature to organize and track progress > towards this release. We can the version from 1.0.0-incubating to > 1.0.0-incubating-alpha.1 given this approach. > > Anthony > > > > On Aug 29, 2015, at 11:49 AM, Justin Erenkrantz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > There are still some todos that need to get sorted out prior to > > issuing a first release (e.g. GEODE-77). Do we think that is a > > reasonable goal to achieve by December (when we'll be due again)? > >
