-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/39738/#review104392
-----------------------------------------------------------


I am not sure whether changing NetView has any impact on backward compatibility.

sanctionedSerializables.txt and sanctionedDataSerializables.txt should be 
changed as well. Since NetView, JoinRequestMessage, JoinResponseMessage and 
InstallViewMessage are all changed.


gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/NetView.java
 
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39738/#comment162662>

    Why this is removed?



gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/NetView.java
 (line 98)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39738/#comment162663>

    Shall we do the same for other non-copy constructors? So that 
failureDetectionPorts are initialized properly.



gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/fd/GMSHealthMonitor.java
 (line 534)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39738/#comment162666>

    failure detection server thread



gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/membership/GMSJoinLeave.java
 (line 659)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39738/#comment162667>

    Remove this line.



gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/membership/GMSJoinLeave.java
 (line 660)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39738/#comment162668>

    Remove this line as well.



gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/membership/GMSJoinLeave.java
 (line 1898)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39738/#comment162669>

    For every iteration, it will use the same port for different mbr. Is this 
expected?



gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/messages/JoinRequestMessage.java
 (line 51)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39738/#comment162657>

    " socketPort:" should be " failureDetectionPort:"



gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/messages/JoinRequestMessage.java
 (line 81)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39738/#comment162670>

    Should be named setFailureDetectionPort



gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/messages/JoinResponseMessage.java
 (line 95)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39738/#comment162658>

    This function should be removed.



gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/messages/JoinResponseMessage.java
 (line 110)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39738/#comment162659>

    This should be removed as well.



gemfire-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache30/ReconnectDUnitTest.java 
(line 329)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/39738/#comment162660>

    What is this code for?


- Jianxia Chen


On Oct. 28, 2015, 10:20 p.m., Bruce Schuchardt wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/39738/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 28, 2015, 10:20 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode and Jianxia Chen.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> We had quite a bit of convoluted code in GMSJoinLeave after implementing the 
> tcp/ip failure detection check.  This change-set moves the location of 
> failure-detection port information out of GMSHealthMonitor and into the 
> NetView class so that it is always carried with the view.  This decouples the 
> health monitor and join-leave and keeps the port information and member 
> information together in a common store.  This also allows us to remove the 
> propagation of request messages from many ViewCreator methods and remove the 
> port-lookup code from join-leave.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/NetView.java
>  cb61a1ba6e90939f026ddffc1983d274b50e3e15 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/fd/GMSHealthMonitor.java
>  d89ba39265478583a407f4803a40d08302c55af3 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/interfaces/HealthMonitor.java
>  628e416a3718bb02b9657d716017e7b0e8658368 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/membership/GMSJoinLeave.java
>  5633424b69bb5b35242015da1d557af358b2f13d 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/messages/InstallViewMessage.java
>  1afdf401ce93c03af1da929f0cd6712c152d0211 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/messages/JoinRequestMessage.java
>  952b20e3fda830f86729d60c7f20513d69dae7eb 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/messages/JoinResponseMessage.java
>  77b72c348be93c1cda623694b3336725748ceefe 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/messenger/JGroupsMessenger.java
>  ae7ee16b818b09a7315210e5c427486ce841ab60 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/util/PluckStacks.java
>  15a64d7441c09e178eaef40598f32226a69c8d00 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/cache30/ReconnectDUnitTest.java
>  26e85869f920fdc6044c059709012e3a9056dfab 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/LocatorDUnitTest.java
>  8779c6d7fe66ef55cf293c19f5f66b7a3ed20823 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/membership/GMSJoinLeaveJUnitTest.java
>  4e3293221e59d45cc8b2e9486b9e008b34225231 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/distributed/internal/membership/gms/messenger/JGroupsMessengerJUnitTest.java
>  2b9d451a5c24fbff740c97658e1e58eef34f5dc8 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39738/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> unit testing (underway)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bruce Schuchardt
> 
>

Reply via email to