To rewrite it or remove all i18n code, I think it's a matter of whether there
are any plans to support i18n in future. Is it on the roadmap?
For now, I will delete the test.
-Roman
On Friday, November 6, 2015 6:38 AM, Darrel Schneider
<[email protected]> wrote:
+1 for getting rid of all i18n code
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Anilkumar Gingade <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Agree...We haven't following the internationalization for sometime...
>
> -Anil.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Kirk Lund <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 for deleting it. Test looks worthless.
> >
> > I'd be in favor of completely replacing the internationalization code in
> > Geode.
> >
> > -Kirk
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Dan Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't see much purpose behind that test either. I'd be in favor of
> > > deleting it.
> > >
> > > -Dan
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Roman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > Can you please explain the purpose of testDefaults()
> > > > in BasicI18nJUnitTest?It fails if run under a locale with a language
> > > other
> > > > than french or english as you describe in the comments.
> > > > -Roman
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
