> On Nov. 16, 2015, 10:38 p.m., Dan Smith wrote:
> > Does this mean that this AlertLevelChangeMessage message is not acked? Does 
> > that have any implications for your test, since the alert level may not be 
> > changed everywhere for some period of time after it is set?

I don't believe it is acked. The test contains explicit gates which wait for 
propagation.


- Jens


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/40369/#review106754
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 16, 2015, 9:48 p.m., Jens Deppe wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/40369/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 16, 2015, 9:48 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode and Dan Smith.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> - Updating the alert level is changed from a pooled message to a serial
>   message. This ensures that consecutive alert level changes are
>   processed in the correct order.
>   
> Also reworked the test so that we're not trying to set the same alert level 
> twice in a row otherwise it becomes difficult to know where the messages have 
> been received.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/admin/remote/AlertLevelChangeMessage.java
>  7e6c0a4ef08cb53f16d7b024778625fbeb976cca 
>   
> gemfire-core/src/test/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/management/DistributedSystemDUnitTest.java
>  193dd1222e235311413ccbb89a00ecf43e657de1 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40369/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran DistributedSystemDUnitTest
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jens Deppe
> 
>

Reply via email to