Yep. I went though *lots* of tickets last night and ran into this all over.
Anthony > On Jan 8, 2016, at 5:22 PM, Jacob Barrett <[email protected]> wrote: > > ++1 > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:06 PM Dan Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ++1 >> >> We're currently getting lots of silly comments on tickets, Especially when >> downmerging from develop to a feature branch. See for example GEODE-364. It >> two messages with the same hash. The second one is reporting that the >> commit was merged to feature/GEODE-715. These extra messages just make the >> history of the ticket more confusing. >> >> -Dan >> >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:57 PM, William Markito <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> The idea here is that feature branches would not update the JIRA tickets >>> anymore, just when they get merged to develop, release or master an entry >>> would be added to the JIRA comments. >>> >>> If we're ok with that I can go ahead and open that ticket with INFRA. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> -- >>> >>> William Markito Oliveira >>> -- For questions about Apache Geode, please write to >>> *[email protected] >>> <[email protected]>* >>> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
