Kirk, We could not think of any such requirement...And with this application will get all the update operation and can take appropriate action (use or ignore)...
-Anil. On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Kirk Lund <kl...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Would any user ever have a reason to enable forwarding of one type but not > the other? If so then I would separate them as forwardEvictionEvents() and > forwardExpirationEvents(). > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Kirk Lund <kl...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > +1 for being more explicit with the "And" conjunction > > > > -Kirk > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > >> I’d prefer to insert a conjunction to clarify the meaning: > >> > >> forwardEvictionAndExpirationEvents() > >> > >> > >> $0.02, > >> Anthony > >> > >> On Apr 12, 2016, at 5:11 PM, Anilkumar Gingade <aging...@pivotal.io> > >> wrote: > >> > >> *New attribute:* "forwardEvictionExpirationEvents()" (Any alternate > >> names?). > >> > >> > >> > > >
