+1 for Geode 1.0.0
And we can leave current @since tags as-is with out "GemFire" to denote
predate Geode.
So if you see "Geode x.y.z" => added in Geode
or "x.y.z" => Predate to Geode (i.e.,)
GemFire.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:37 PM, John Blum <jb...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> +1 for @since Geode 1.0.0.
>
> @since GemFire x.y.z is probably not all that useful from a Geode
> perspective, but maybe important in GemFire source, particularly for
> features that maybe specific to GemFire, or predate Geode.
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Dan Smith <upthewatersp...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have a lot of @since tags in our javadocs with old gemfire
> > versions. I think we are going to keep them in there, we should maybe
> > do a sweep and add gemfire to the version:
> >
> > Eg
> > @since GemFire 5.5
> >
> > For geode @since tags, we can start from 1.0:
> > @since 1.0
> >
> > Or maybe it would be better to be explicit?
> > @since Geode 1.0
> >
> > What do you guys think?
> > -Dan
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -John
> 503-504-8657
> john.blum10101 (skype)
>
--
Sai Boorlagadda
