-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47143/#review132431
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Jens Deppe


On May 10, 2016, 12:20 a.m., Kirk Lund wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/47143/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 10, 2016, 12:20 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Jens Deppe and Jinmei Liao.
> 
> 
> Bugs: GEODE-951
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-951
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> GEODE-951: repackage GemFireParameterizedMessage and 
> GemFireParameterizedMessageFactory
> 
> * move to package com.gemstone.gemfire.internal.logging.log4j.message
> * add javadocs about original source of these classes
> * add comments pointing out Geode optimizations in these classes
>  
> Since these files were moved to a new package, I have annotated the two 
> classes to mark the lines with new javadocs or comments.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/logging/LogService.java
>  5572d11 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/logging/log4j/LogWriterLogger.java
>  f1e314a 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/logging/log4j/message/GemFireParameterizedMessage.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/gemfire/internal/logging/log4j/message/GemFireParameterizedMessageFactory.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/org/apache/logging/log4j/message/GemFireParameterizedMessage.java
>  d638a8c 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/com/gemstone/org/apache/logging/log4j/message/GemFireParameterizedMessageFactory.java
>  f113aa6 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/47143/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> precheckin
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kirk Lund
> 
>

Reply via email to