Geode currently bundles xerial/snappy <https://github.com/xerial/snappy-java> as a default implementation. And this is a "JNI wrapper" on google snappy <http://google.github.io/snappy/> implementation.
"xerial/snappy" jar bundles several pre-compiled static libraries to support various OS (linux, windows, SunOS) and architectures (x86, Sparc etc). The current dependency (1.1.1.6) does not support SunOS (Sparc), so the plan is to upgrade to a more recent version. While upgrading to a more recent version, I found a pure java port <https://github.com/dain/snappy> of original C++ implementation and wanted to swap with use pure java implementation to avoid any platform specific dependency on Geode. >From the creator - "*the pure Java port is 20-30% faster for block compress, 0-10% slower for block uncompress, and 0-5% slower for round-trip block compression.*". Though native version is better on uncompress (more number of gets, puts depending on use cases), I would still vote for distributing with a pure java version as a "default" implementation as Geode already exposes an interface to allow any one to provide any custom implementation. In case if there are any differences between these two implementations, swapping with a pure java version should not impact any existing users, as Geode does not save compressed data to disk or on to the wire. Let me know if any one has different thoughts? Sai
