>From a technology readiness perspective, hosting the docs on a different (Apache) site should not be too hard; I've built the docs locally and on AWS without any major issues.
Irrespective of the hosting location, the content license needs to be fixed - as per the current github repo [1], it still has Pivotal copyright though the generated pages (ruby/ markdown to HTML) has ASF copyright in the footer. Nitin [1] https://github.com/project-geode/docs On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Gregory Chase <gch...@pivotal.io> wrote: > This is an interesting topic. > > I've noted Planet Cassandra has free high quality vendor support on behalf > of the Apache Cassandra project. > > What is appropriate in terms of core content in the community versus > adjunct members of the community such as companies to create derivative > works? > > I could imagine the collaborative authoring of documentation might take > place on the wiki, for example. However companies interested in creating > commercial derivatives might choose to take this content, do additional > editing, add proprietary value-added information, and lay it out in a more > visually pleasing manner. > > -Greg > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Niall Pemberton < > niall.pember...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > > > We plan at some point to donate the docs so they'll be incorporated > into > > > the repo. Is this a prerequisite to graduating from incubation? > > > > > > > What is the status of the docs being donated? I raise this because the > > Cassandra project was recently given a hard time by a board member about > > docs hosted on a vendor site[1]. > > > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/uqsizgjxi7lwjcv7 > > > > Niall > > > > > > -- > Greg Chase > > Global Head, Big Data Communities > http://www.pivotal.io/big-data > > Pivotal Software > http://www.pivotal.io/ > > 650-215-0477 > @GregChase > Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/ >