+1
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Sai Boorlagadda <sai.boorlaga...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for package renaming. > > Sai > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:42 AM, William Markito <wmark...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > ++1 to finally do it! This is great! > > > > We should include not only Spring Data Geode but also Apache Zeppelin, > > Apache Apex... > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > We completed the M3 release in August and now we should consider the > > scope > > > for the next release: 1.0.0-incubating. We’ve had previous > discussions > > on > > > this topic [1] but I would like us to reopen the conversation and make > > sure > > > we are all still in agreement. In particular, I think we are getting > > > pretty close to being ready for graduation [2] with one exception: we > > need > > > to rename our source packages to ‘org.apache.geode’ [3]. > > > > > > I think we should move forward with package renaming *now* and include > > > that in the scope for the 1.0.0-incubating release. > > > > > > As previously discussed [4] we’d like to preserve protocol > compatibility > > > for existing users of client/server and WAN. This should only affect a > > > handful of classes that would remain in the ‘com.gemstone.gemfire’ > > > namespace (we should identify those soon). > > > > > > Thoughts? What else belongs in 1.0.0-incubating? > > > > > > Anthony > > > > > > [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geode-dev/201604. > > > mbox/%3cCAFh+7k1nMh8muFDs7NuXzj7q3mBy9NrJeC > 0jMA=hqxE=EAfWxw@mail.gmail. > > > com%3e > > > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Maturity+Level > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-37 > > > [4] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode- > > > dev/201509.mbox/%3cCAEzsiBOUmfdmQA8X29gzUTeB_ > 6jV9tbDLHCZYXhFSbBXmaQQAw@ > > > mail.gmail.com%3e > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > ~/William > > >
