Speaking of jackson, anyone know why we’re not using v2.2.0 for the scala module? This is a dependency of geode-web-api.
jackson.version = 2.2.0 jackson-module-scala_2.10.version = 2.1.5 Anthony > On Sep 8, 2016, at 10:32 AM, John Blum <jb...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > +1 to standardizing Geode on Jackson for JSON processing. > > +1 to using JsonPath/json-path-assert for testing interactions in Geode on > JSON docs. > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Yes, we should change all json parsing code to use jackson. However, we >> still need to write unit tests and that's what json-path-assert is for. >> I've researched all of the ways to perform json assertions for unit tests >> and test-path-assert is currently the best. It's from com.jayway same as >> Awaitility. >> >> -Kirk >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Jinmei Liao <jil...@pivotal.io> wrote: >> >>> Can we get rid of TypedJson in favor of some standard json libraries? >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> To support fixing up unit tests that involve json, I'd like to add in a >>>> dependency on com.jayway.jsonpath:json-path-assert. >>>> >>>> We already have a dependency on com.jayway.jsonpath:json-path (for >>>> spring-hateoas). json-path-assert basically adds some new Hamcrest >>> matchers >>>> for clean assertions involving json. >>>> >>>> I intend to use this in TypedJsonJUnitTest (GEODE-1842) because that >>>> test doesn't currently have assertions(!). >>>> >>>> -Kirk >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers >>> >>> Jinmei >>> >> > > > > -- > -John > 503-504-8657 > john.blum10101 (skype)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
