+1 for creating branch now to prevent feature creep. On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:10 PM Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org> wrote:
> I think we should propose creating that release branch sooner (now?) so we > can minimize unplanned changes slipping into 1.0 and destabilizing it. > > -Kirk > > On Thursday, September 29, 2016, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > Using the gitflow approach, we cut a release/1.0.0 branch to isolate the > > release branch from ongoing development. For past releases we have > waited > > as long as possible to cut the branch to minimize overhead. Perhaps this > > time we should create the branch earlier. > > > > JIRA shows the open issues for 1.0.0 [1] but there are some deltas > > compared to the last release scope email [2]. > > > > GEODE-17 / GEODE-1570 was mentioned as a possible candidate for 1.0.0 but > > the Fix Version is not set > > GEODE-1168 was not included in the 1.0.0 scope discussions but Fix > Version > > is set to 1.0.0 > > GEODE-1914 is follow on work from the package namespace changes > > > > @Swapnil, does this accurately reflect the scope discussions for 1.0.0? > > If so, I can update the bugs. > > > > Anthony > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > > 3D%20GEODE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.0.0-incubating% > > 20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY% > > 20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > > > > [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-geode- > > dev/201609.mbox/%3cCANZq1gBzMTEM_JHzw2YT_LZeC5g472XkNCfJhma76xah=Yyq6A@ > > mail.gmail.com%3e > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 1:02 PM, Kirk Lund <kl...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > > What changes are we still waiting on to cut the next RC of Geode 1.0? > > > > > > Is there a way to create a branch for Geode 1.0 develop that allows > folks > > > to continue working on post-1.0 features or bug fixes without > > destabilizing > > > Geode 1.0? This way, only the necessary changes for Geode 1.0 would go > to > > > the 1.0 branch? > > > > > > -Kirk > > > > >
