That sounds like the end result I was hoping for. On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Sorry, yes, I meant a new geode-docs subdirectory. > > -Dan > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Anthony Baker <aba...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> Did you mean a new top-level dir (e.g. geode-docs) or a subdir of >> geode-core? Since the docs could cover multiple components I’m not sure it >> makes sense to put them under geode-core. >> >> Anthony >> >> >> > >> > I think we should just go ahead and create a feature branch off of the >> the >> > current geode develop and merge these changes in as a geode-core >> > subdirectory. We could start the work of cleaning up the build >> > instructions, etc. right away on that feature branch. >> > >> > -Dan >> > >> >> >
