-1 for this I do understand the intent and reason behind this, however, in addition to the reasons Anthony provided, I do not believe this community should carry the burden of testing compatibility with proprietary/commercial software. Even though Geode has its history in GemFire, I can only see the community supporting official Geode releases. It would set a bad precedent to allow for any part of the Geode code ( source or test ) to depend on any commercial code.
If any company wants to make sure their software works with Geode, it is their responsibility. My $.02, --Mark On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Yes, dist.gemstone.com. > > > Le 10/6/2016 à 9:08 AM, Dick Cavender a écrit : > >> Only on initial setup/access to repo.pivotal.io is the EULA acceptance >> required. After that you should be able to pull from any repo there without >> interaction but you will need to provide the creds as part of the pull. >> >> Are you instead using dist.gemstone.com for the older jars which is the >> original repo that lives in the spring s3 repo >> >> >> On 10/6/2016 7:48 AM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote: >> >>> Thanks Anthony. >>> >>> I thought there was some interest in supporting old GemFire clients and >>> WAN. Is there no way to download it without a login/EULA? I'm currently >>> using a different repo but maybe that's only available in Pivotal's network. >>> >>> As far as M3 goes, do you think there would be any value in testing >>> against it? I don't want to introduce new tests unless they are helpful. >>> >>> Le 10/5/2016 à 5:31 PM, Anthony Baker a écrit : >>> >>>> Given that the official Pivotal maven repo [1] is locked behind a login >>>> and a EULA I think this might not work so well. The license compatibility >>>> issues would need to be explored as well. >>>> >>>> How would you feel about testing backwards compatibility against >>>> 1.0.0-incubating.M3? >>>> >>>> Anthony >>>> >>>> [1] http://commercial-repo.pivotal.io >>>> >>>> On Oct 5, 2016, at 4:17 PM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> We now have a backward-compatibility module but it's not well tested. >>>>> I'd >>>>> like to add tests to this module that run against GemFire jars >>>>> downloaded >>>>> from the Pivotal maven repository. I've already implemented the >>>>> framework >>>>> and some smoke tests but want to know how people feel about the tests >>>>> downloading something proprietary to test against and whether failures >>>>> would be something the community cares about. >>>>> >>>>> If we don't want this I'll keep it out of the repo until we have a >>>>> 1.0.0 >>>>> release to test against. >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
