-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/53199/#review153926
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Udo Kohlmeyer


On Oct. 26, 2016, 6:30 p.m., Bruce Schuchardt wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/53199/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 26, 2016, 6:30 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Hitesh Khamesra and Udo Kohlmeyer.
> 
> 
> Bugs: geode-2000
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/geode-2000
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The previous fix for this caused confusion as it changed the server memberId 
> that is used in other places and should remain unchanged.  This change set 
> alters just the listener-invocation code in the client cache so that client 
> events are based on the ServerLocation information returned by the Locator or 
> added to the connection pool by applications.
> 
> Udo worked with me on this and we found the listener invocation code to be 
> somewhat convoluted, mixing server-side notification about clients with 
> client-side notification about servers in the same code.  This lead to a bit 
> of refactoring in InternalClientMembership to separate the two.
> 
> A number of changes had to be made in test code.  Some tests were requiring 
> that client-side listeners see the server's exact member ID which is no 
> longer true since the ID being fabricated out of a ServerLocation doesn't 
> have as much detail as the true member ID and so is not equal() to it.  Some 
> other test code was creating ServerLocation objects with non-existent host 
> names.  This is no longer allowed so we changed these tests to use a numeric 
> IP address.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/client/internal/EndpointManagerImpl.java
>  ec8a81833ba502fae4672529f755147d5639d42e 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/distributed/internal/membership/InternalDistributedMember.java
>  ac8379bddab6582daf7661640e9f894633bfda67 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/tier/InternalClientMembership.java
>  656f7ded38b175792f08255f8f916e89a704db2e 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/tier/sockets/CacheClientUpdater.java
>  90cdedaaa847af956c088075df6ff42326712118 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/tier/sockets/HandShake.java
>  5e13be091070e5c31d61f3288ca7008e64481f5f 
>   
> geode-core/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/tier/sockets/ServerConnection.java
>  47932d014538ec55e5781a451534715be2d82f25 
>   
> geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/client/internal/AutoConnectionSourceImplJUnitTest.java
>  63fc8d58ea2c728e0d8c633f8be44d057225c2fc 
>   
> geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/client/internal/pooling/ConnectionManagerJUnitTest.java
>  1017db2229b437837e6dfb10e00cdb12d709b5e8 
>   
> geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/partition/PartitionRegionHelperDUnitTest.java
>  a4494ca71b32bf97b0e65b6eb02036f4be4b45d1 
>   
> geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache30/ClientMembershipDUnitTest.java
>  83b75d5f92915710a6be1eff903df79e741737ce 
>   
> geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/distributed/internal/DistributionManagerDUnitTest.java
>  1329c24fb1af808aa245e550f75e259bb9bb63c3 
>   
> geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/internal/cache/PartitionedRegionQueryEvaluatorIntegrationTest.java
>  4e8408c74a718ce2333e725ca83d8fed7f4b42c0 
>   
> geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/management/UniversalMembershipListenerAdapterDUnitTest.java
>  019bd0f2acc76e2cffec342868f221bdf55b431c 
>   geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/test/fake/Fakes.java 
> aaf3e281c7fba82f2ab437122af66373ce967494 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/53199/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> precheckin, new unit test
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bruce Schuchardt
> 
>

Reply via email to