Just caught this message. I'll fix ConnectToLocatorSSLDUnitTest and look
for other tests that aren't tearing down gfsh properly.

-Kirk


On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Jinmei Liao <jil...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> Thanks Bruce. Looking at the ConnectToLocatorSSLDUnitTest, we did have a
> gfsh there that's not properly closed. I will work with Kirk to close this.
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I think the code is in Gfsh.notifyDisconnect().  I think the test that's
> > polluting others is ConnectToLocatorSSLDUnitTest.  I had a failure with
> > this suspect string in a test that ran just after it. I added a thread
> dump
> > in the @After of that test and see that it's leaving one of these threads
> > behind along with some Gfsh Launcher threads.
> >
> >
> > Le 10/27/2016 à 10:54 AM, Kirk Lund a écrit :
> >
> >> Bruce, can you please point me at the JDK code you think is generating
> the
> >> fatal message? I looked in RMIConnector.java and can't find it in there.
> >>
> >> Maybe we can fix ordering of tearDown or something else in order to
> "fix"
> >> this message.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Kirk
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >>
> >> Just looking at a couple of these bugs, these are fatal level errors. Do
> >>> you know what is causing them or what affect this might have?
> >>>
> >>> [fatal 2016/09/29 12:12:03.891 PDT <JMX client heartbeat 3> tid=0x18d]
> >>> (tid=397 msgId=39) No longer connected to cc6-co6.gemstone.com[27162].
> >>>
> >>> -Dan
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Bruce Schuchardt <
> >>> bschucha...@pivotal.io>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We have 23 CI failure tickets concerning suspect strings from "JMX
> client
> >>>> heartbeat" threads.  I think we should add this to
> ExpectedStrings.java
> >>>>
> >>> and
> >>>
> >>>> close these tickets.  The suspect strings are coming from
> >>>> javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnector and I don't think there's
> >>>> anything we can do about them.  Most, if not all, are assigned to
> >>>>
> >>> security
> >>>
> >>>> or JMX components.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>     GEODE-1858
> >>>>     GEODE-1955
> >>>>     GEODE-1492
> >>>>     GEODE-1539
> >>>>     GEODE-1538
> >>>>     GEODE-1773
> >>>>     GEODE-1922
> >>>>     GEODE-1482
> >>>>     GEODE-1475
> >>>>     GEODE-1480
> >>>>     GEODE-1481
> >>>>     GEODE-1826
> >>>>     GEODE-1825
> >>>>     GEODE-1820
> >>>>     GEODE-1878
> >>>>     GEODE-1879
> >>>>     GEODE-1877
> >>>>     GEODE-1875
> >>>>     GEODE-1876
> >>>>     GEODE-1499
> >>>>     GEODE-1476
> >>>>     GEODE-1869
> >>>>     GEODE-1769
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Jinmei

Reply via email to