This looks interesting. We welcome concrete suggestions for what technology pieces would be helpful to the Geronimo security architecture.
Regards, Alan > -----Original Message----- > From: Christophe Ney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 3:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: secure pot for geronimo JVM > > Note: Resending due to invalid CC > > Holger, > > ProActive is an open source project from the INRIA/OASIS lab, > the source is available in the download. It is very high tech > project that resulted research work conducted by the OASIS > group, but the code base has been broadly deployed, and the > software is now quite mature (see project docs) > > As you can imagine, this kind of project is really driven by > a single team and CVS was not very attrative to them as they > were refactoring quite a lot. SVN is what they need, so > we are setting it up (does this ring any bell? :-) ) > > Looking at security, ObjectWeb would be very happy to set-up > collaboration on Security with Apache, and we should be able > to accomodate licensing for the parts that are of common interest > (change to BSD is what we have already been able to achieve for > ASM and JOTM). > > Thanks, > Christophe > > Christophe Ney > Executive Director > ObjectWeb Consortium > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Holger Baxmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: lundi 31 mai 2004 23:31 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: secure pot for geronimo JVM > > > > > > Is anybody aware of the ProActive project? > > > > http://www-sop.inria.fr/oasis/ProActive/ > > > > http://www-sop.inria.fr/oasis/ProActive/doc/api/org/objectweb/proa > ctive/doc- > files/Security.html > > I am on the way to evaluate it for having a secure, signed, non- > vandalising > wrapper to have a either paranoid SecurityManager environment or the > default > open-door startup environment for gero. > > Especially StartSecureNode could not be find by me in the (LGPLed) source > downloads. AFAIK anonymous cvs is not available. > > Package names start with org.objectweb - so i was thinking ... > > thanks alot > > bax >
