Sorry about that... You said what you meant... I missed the parenthetical remark at first...
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:16:47 -0500, Brad Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe you meant to say... > > "EJB 2.1 is a required part of J2EE 1.4" > > > > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:07:36 -0700, Dain Sundstrom > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Sep 15, 2004, at 7:37 AM, John Woolsey wrote: > > > > > Are these publicly available yet? I heard they where going to be > > > available because of JBoss certification or something. How about the > > > EJB 1.1 spec tests? > > > > We can not publish the J2EE compatibility tests. The tests are owned > > by Sun and only licensed to Apache for us to run them to determine > > compatibility. I personally would love to have these tests publicly > > available, but it is something for Sun to decide. > > > > As for your question on EJB 1.1, I am not allowed to give any > > information on the tests themselves, but I can say that EJB 1.1 is a > > required part of J2EE 1.4 (required for backward compatibility). > > > > -dain > > > > >
