On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> Who cares? I don't think we should limit our selves to pure 88 just so
> we can have support for other servers. Frankly, I would be shocked if
> anyone used our command line tool for anther server, when every server
> ships with a tool custom to the server (with enhancements).
> ...
> I was totally with you, up to this section. I don't think we shoe horn
> it at all. If you are running offline, you simply execute the exiting
> code, which isn't 88 at all. Use 88 when it is nice fit and something
> custom when it isn't.
> ...
> Again, I frankly don't care what 88 says is legal. Geronimo lets you
> deploy most application without plans. David Jencks just committed a
> big change to resource adapter naming so most ears don't need a plan at
> all. If we followed this logic, we would have to have the following
> plan most of the time:
OK, it just feels like we're taking advantage of undocumented
features. Even it they're our own undocumented features. :)
Aaron
