If there's anything I can do to help, I'm still up, and my Axis build works other than the new problem.
Aaron On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, David Jencks wrote: > sorry everyone, I never got my axis build cleaned up before starting on > this parentid adventure. Working to fix it now... I hope I can fix my > axis build. > > thanks > david jencks > > On Nov 7, 2004, at 9:12 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: > > > This checkin: > > > > geronimo/trunk/modules/j2ee-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/j2ee/ > > deployment/EARConfigBuilder.java > > Revision 56855 - (view) (download) - [select for diffs] > > Modified Sun Nov 7 17:26:43 2004 UTC (7 hours, 50 minutes ago) by > > djencks > > File length: 26550 byte(s) > > Diff to previous 56771 (colored) > > > > implement GERONIMO-435. Every builder can specify the default parentId. > > For services, a module can specify the empty string parentId="" to get > > no > > parent. > > > > Seems to have broken the Axis module: > > > > [javac] symbol : constructor > > EARConfigBuilder(javax.management.ObjectName,javax.management.ObjectNam > > e,javax.management.ObjectName,javax.management.ObjectName,javax.managem > > ent.ObjectName,<nulltype>,org.openejb.deployment.OpenEJBModuleBuilder,o > > rg.openejb.deployment.OpenEJBModuleBuilder,<nulltype>,<nulltype>,org.ap > > ache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.ResourceReferenceBuilder,<nulltype>,<null > > type>) > > [javac] location: class > > org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.EARConfigBuilder > > [javac] EARConfigBuilder earConfigBuilder = new > > EARConfigBuilder(j2eeServer, > > [javac] ^ > > > > By changing the constructor that Axis depends upon. The Axis > > module catches a lot of heat, but the WSConfigBuilder was last changed > > 5 > > days ago. I can only assume that "someone" didn't do a full[*] build > > before checking in, because this is a clear compile failure, not even a > > test problem. There's a similar problem with the OpenEJBModuleBuilder, > > with the same cause. > > > > I believe dims had a preliminary fix, but didn't check it in > > tonight, so unfortunately things are still broken. I think he needs to > > change the Axis code to access existing GBeans instead of constructing > > new > > ones, but still, this was highly preventable. > > > > Thanks, > > Aaron > > > > [*] full build without anything like "the axis module commented out > > locally" > > > >
